The Collapse of Unentangled Stoquastic Merlin-Arthur Proof Systems

arXiv:2605.1624947.8
AI Analysis

For complexity theorists, this separates the roles of entanglement and interference in quantum verification, showing that without destructive interference, multiple unentangled provers offer no advantage.

This work proves that unentanglement does not enhance the power of stoquastic Merlin-Arthur proof systems: for any polynomial number of provers, StoqMA(k) = StoqMA. The result is achieved via a positive de Finetti theorem that allows absorbing product-state constraints into a single-witness stoquastic verifier.

Entanglement and interference are among the most fundamental properties of quantum mechanics. In this work, we investigate the role and power of interference in the context of detecting entanglement. We do so from a computational complexity lens by proving that unentanglement gives no additional power to stoquastic Merlin-Arthur verification. For every polynomial number of provers $k=k(n)$, \[ \text{StoqMa}(k)=\text{StoqMa} . \] Conceptually, the proof separates the role of entanglement from the role of interference: once destructive interference is ruled out by stoquasticity, the product-state constraint can be absorbed into a polynomially larger one-witness stoquastic verification. The main analytic ingredient is a positive, value-based de Finetti theorem for separately symmetric extensions. If $M$ is an entrywise nonnegative positive semidefinite contraction on $A_1\otimes\cdots\otimes A_k$, then the nonnegative product value of $M$ is approximated to additive error $ε$ by the largest eigenvalue of \[ Π_R^{<k} (M_{A_{1,1}\cdots A_{k-1,1}A_k}\otimes I) Π_R^{<k}, \qquad R=O\!\left(\frac{k^2\sum_i\log\dim A_i}{ε^3}\right), \] where $Π_R^{<k}$ is the operator on $A_1^{\otimes R} \otimes \cdots \otimes A_{k-1}^{\otimes R} \otimes A_k$ projecting to the subspace $\mathrm{Sym}^R(A_1) \otimes \cdots \otimes \mathrm{Sym}^{R}(A_{k-1}) \otimes A_k$. The spectral relaxation is then realized as an actual one-witness stoquastic verifier. After replacing the uniform permutation averages in the symmetric projectors by inverse-polynomially close dyadic inverse-invariant averages. Consequently, \[ \text{StoqMa}(k)=\text{StoqMa}\subseteq\text{AM}\cap\text{PP}\subseteq\text{PSPACE} . \] The positive de Finetti theorem is isolated as a standalone technique and may be useful in other nonnegative tensor-optimization and stoquastic-verification settings.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes