CRMay 18

Bridging the Cybersecurity Gap Between Web2 and Web3 - An Incident-Based Analysis of Organizational and Application-Level Security Failures

arXiv:2605.184846.1h-index: 5
Predicted impact top 95% in CR · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

For Web3 organizations and security practitioners, this work provides a structured approach to address real-world security gaps that are often overlooked by generic frameworks.

This paper analyzes high-impact Web3 security breaches (e.g., Bybit, Ronin Bridge, DMM Bitcoin) and finds that most failures stem from off-chain systems, key management, and human processes rather than smart contract vulnerabilities. It proposes blockchain-specific security control categories to adapt existing ISMS frameworks for Web3.

The rapid adoption of Web3 infrastructures has led to a growing number of security incidents affecting cryptocurrency exchanges, custody services and blockchain-based platforms. While existing research predominantly focuses on vulnerabilities in smart contracts and blockchain protocols, a substantial portion of real-world losses originates from off-chain systems, organizational processes and human-centered operational workflows. This paper presents a qualitative, incident-based analysis of publicly documented, high-impact security breaches in the Web3 ecosystem, including the Bybit exchange incident (2025), the Ronin Network bridge compromise (2022), and the DMM Bitcoin exchange breach (2024). The selected cases are systematically analysed and mapped to established Web2 security reference frameworks, including OWASP-based vulnerability categories and organizational security control domains. The results indicate that dominant failure patterns in Web3 environments are insufficiently addressed by generic security control catalogues, particularly with respect to cryptographic key management, transaction approval governance, signer and validator infrastructure, third-party tooling dependencies, and human-in-the-loop processes. Based on these findings, this paper argues for the adoption of established information security management systems (ISMS) in Web3 organizations and derives a structured set of blockchain-specific cybersecurity control categories to operationalize existing ISMS frameworks for blockchain-based systems. The proposed categories aim to bridge the gap between generic security governance frameworks and domain-specific risks inherent to Web3 infrastructures.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes