Active Sensing Subserves Task-Level Control

arXiv:2605.2298816.0
Predicted impact top 60% in NC · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

For robotics and control theory, this paper provides a conceptual framework linking active sensing to task-level control, potentially guiding the design of more robust and adaptive engineered systems.

The paper proposes that active sensing movements emerge from the combination of adaptive sensors, movement-sensing linkage, and task-level control, rather than from sensory goals. It argues that this perspective, supported by empirical data and theory, explains why animals switch between 'explore' and 'exploit' modes, and suggests that incorporating such strategies could improve robotic control systems.

Active sensing is traditionally defined as the expenditure of energy, typically in the form of movement, for obtaining information. Here, we propose that the combination of reliance on adaptive sensors, the linkage between movement and sensing, and task-level control inevitably gives rise to the emergence of active sensing movements. In this way, active sensing is not driven by sensory goals, such as minimizing uncertainty about the state, but rather is necessary for task-level control. This hypothesis, that active sensing subserves control, is supported by both empirical data from organisms and mathematical theory. Interestingly, active sensing behaviors often occur in discrete epochs, interspersed with goal-oriented behavior. This suggests that animals switch between two behavioral modes with distinct control policies, an `explore' mode in which animals produce dynamic movements to shape sensory feedback, and an `exploit' mode in which animals produce slower compensatory movements that are directly related to achieving task goals. This strategy for feedback control that relies on adaptive sensors, active sensing, and mode switching is not commonly used in engineered systems despite being ubiquitous in biology. Engineered systems comprising state-of-the-art sensors, actuators, and mechanical designs can outperform animals with respect to ``cost functions'' such as maximum force generation, precision, and speed. Nevertheless, animals routinely achieve robust, graceful behaviors that are currently unmatched by engineered systems, suggesting that current control systems are insufficient. These insights, expressed in the language of control theory, may be critical for improving robotic sensing and control.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes