LGAIMay 22

Truthful Online Preference Aggregation for LLM Fine-Tuning in Mobile Crowdsourcing

arXiv:2605.2405272.1
AI Analysis

For mobile crowdsourcing platforms using LLMs, this work provides a mechanism to aggregate truthful human feedback online, solving a key bottleneck of strategic worker misreporting.

This paper addresses truthful online preference aggregation for LLM fine-tuning in mobile crowdsourcing, where workers may misreport feedback. The proposed mechanism achieves sublinear regret O(√T) and ensures truthful feedback, outperforming benchmarks in experiments.

To better serve users' demands in mobile applications (e.g., navigation), mobile crowdsourcing platforms can iteratively align large language model (LLM)-generated content (e.g., AI-generated traffic condition predictions) with human feedback collected from crowdsourcing workers (e.g., mobile users). However, workers may strategically misreport their online preference feedback to maximize their influence or payment. Existing pipelines in mobile crowdsourcing (e.g., EM-based weight estimation) fail to identify the most accurate worker in this online setting, resulting in a linear regret $\mathcal{O}(T)$ over $T$ time slots. In this paper, we study truthful online preference aggregation for LLM fine-tuning in mobile crowdsourcing. We formulate a new dynamic Bayesian game to model the multi-agent online learning process between the platform and strategic mobile workers. We propose a novel online weighted aggregation mechanism that dynamically adjusts each worker's weight in the preference aggregation according to their feedback accuracy. We prove that our mechanism ensures truthful feedback from strategic workers and achieves a sublinear regret $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{T})$ over $T$ time slots. We further extend our mechanism to a challenging scenario with limited worker feedback per time slot, still guaranteeing a sublinear regret $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{T})$. Experiments on LLM fine-tuning with real-world datasets further demonstrate significant performance gains of our mechanisms over benchmark schemes.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes