CLAIHCMay 24

Evidence-Linked Radiology Reporting: A Human-Supervised Reference Architecture for Structured Imaging Intelligence

arXiv:2605.2512064.0
Predicted impact top 95% in CL · last 90 daysOriginality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

For radiologists and clinical teams, this architecture addresses the problem of fragmented structured information in radiology reporting, but the contribution is incremental as it combines existing technologies without novel algorithmic advances.

The paper proposes a human-supervised reference architecture for structured radiology reporting that integrates exam-specific templates, speech-to-structure processing, measurement capture, and standards-based interoperability. The framework aims to improve data reuse and integration with clinical systems, but no concrete performance numbers are provided.

Radiology reports remain the primary mechanism by which imaging findings are communicated to clinical teams. However, much of the structured information behind these reports, including measurements, image evidence, prior comparisons, lesion identity, uncertainty, and terminology, often remains trapped in free text or fragmented across picture archiving and communication systems, radiology information systems, reporting workstations, worksheets, advanced visualization tools, and electronic health records. This paper proposes a human-supervised, evidence-linked reference architecture for structured radiology reporting. The framework combines exam-specific templates, speech-to-structure processing, measurement and segmentation capture, controlled AI-assisted drafting, and standards-based interoperability using DICOM, DICOM Structured Reporting, DICOM Segmentation, HL7 FHIR, RadLex, SNOMED CT, LOINC, and UCUM. The system is positioned not as an autonomous report generator, but as a structured intelligence layer for enterprise imaging that supports reviewed reporting, longitudinal comparison, clinical data reuse, governance, and integration with PACS, RIS, EHR, analytics, and registry workflows. The paper also discusses modality-specific deployment considerations, clinical safety risks, validation requirements, cybersecurity, privacy, quality management, and regulatory boundaries for AI-assisted radiology reporting systems.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes