CLMay 25

Selective Latent Thinking: Adaptive Compression of LLM Reasoning Chains

arXiv:2605.2574531.6Has Code
Predicted impact top 42% in CL · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

For LLM practitioners, SLT offers a method to reduce inference cost of chain-of-thought reasoning while maintaining high accuracy, addressing a key efficiency bottleneck.

Selective Latent Thinking (SLT) selectively compresses redundant reasoning spans into latent representations while preserving precision-critical steps as explicit chain-of-thought, achieving 22.7% higher accuracy than latent reasoning baselines at comparable compression ratios and reducing reasoning chain length by 58.4% with only 2.8% accuracy degradation compared to explicit CoT.

Explicit chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning substantially improves the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs), but incurs high inference cost due to lengthy autoregressive traces. Existing latent reasoning methods offer a promising alternative, yet they often treat reasoning as uniformly compressible, causing precision-critical intermediate steps to be overly compressed and thereby degrading reasoning accuracy. In this work, we propose Selective Latent Thinking (SLT), a framework that selectively compresses redundant reasoning spans into latent representations while preserving precision-critical spans as explicit CoT within the same reasoning trajectory. Specifically, SLT first uses a lightweight decoder to anticipate a short upcoming reasoning span, and then applies confidence-based gating to determine the longest span that can be reliably compressed. The accepted span is encoded into a compact latent representation to improve reasoning efficiency, while uncertain or precision-critical reasoning remains in explicit CoT form to preserve accuracy. To learn this selective compression policy, SLT adopts a three-stage training strategy that combines span-level latent compression, reliability-aware future reasoning prediction, and trajectory-level reinforcement learning to optimize the trade-off between answer correctness and reasoning cost. Extensive experiments across four mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that SLT achieves 22.7\% higher accuracy than latent reasoning baselines at comparable compression ratios, while reducing reasoning chain length by 58.4\% with only 2.8\% accuracy degradation compared to explicit CoT,Our code can be found in https://github.com/hunshi34/SLT.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes