A Fixed-Budget, Cluster-Aware Standard for LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation: A Multi-Hop RAG Stress Test
For researchers evaluating multi-hop RAG systems, this work provides a rigorous standard to avoid inflated claims from clustered data and statistical pitfalls.
The paper identifies that LLM-as-a-judge evaluations for multi-hop RAG systems conflate multiple factors and proposes a minimum measurement standard (fixed budget, cluster-aware inference, pre-registration). Applying this standard to a new evolutionary evidence selector (GADMEC) changes the empirical story: a binomial test shows four significant comparisons, but cluster-aware inference leaves only one Bonferroni-significant result, and BM25 outperforms pure semantic GADMEC under the same budget.
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems are often compared by asking a large language model (LLM) judge which answer is better. For multi-hop RAG, this has become a measurement problem as much as a modeling problem: the same score can reflect retrieval quality, answer length, lexical overlap, or a statistical test that ignores clustered data. We ask what happens when these choices are made explicit. We propose a minimum measurement standard for LLM-as-a-judge comparisons in RAG. The standard fixes the top-100 candidate pool, evidence budget, answer cap, generator, and prompt; it also requires pre-registered hypotheses, cluster-aware inference, an exact cluster sign-flip check when feasible, and second-judge replication. Clustered benchmarks can overstate progress; the field should adopt this standard. We stress-test it with Genetic Algorithm Decoder for Multi-hop Evidence Composition (GADMEC), an evolutionary evidence selector, on 400 multi-hop questions in computer science/machine learning (CS/ML) and Materials Science. The protocol changes the empirical story. A binomial test makes all four semantic-baseline comparisons look significant; cluster-aware inference leaves only one Bonferroni-significant result. BM25 beats pure semantic GADMEC under the same budget, while a lexical-semantic hybrid recovers in CS/ML and narrows the Materials Science gap.