CRMay 28

SAMD: A Tool for Identifying False Data Injection Scenarios in AI/ML-enabled Medical Devices

arXiv:2605.2921074.5h-index: 18
AI Analysis

For developers of AI/ML-enabled medical devices, SAMD provides an automated tool to identify security vulnerabilities during the design phase, addressing the challenge of anticipating false data injection risks.

SAMD automates STPA-Sec analysis for AI/ML-enabled medical devices, identifying false data injection scenarios. In case studies on five FDA-cleared devices, it achieved 100% precision in identifying device technologies, 63.2% precision in retrieving known vulnerabilities, and 95.3% accuracy in generating attack scenarios, with a maximum runtime of 191.64s.

The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in medical systems requires effective measures to address emerging security risks. One such risk is that of adversaries introducing false data through vulnerable system components during inference, causing misdiagnosis and wrong treatments. These risks are challenging to anticipate and address in the design phase, as the system assembly partially occurs during actual use by end users. To address this concern, we introduce SAMD, an automated tool for performing System Theoretic Process Analysis for Security (STPA-Sec) on AI/ML-enabled medical devices during the design phase. SAMD models the medical system as a control structure, treating all system components as potential points for injecting false data into the ML engine. It leverages state-of-the-art vulnerability databases and Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate vulnerability discovery and generate a list of potential attack scenarios. We demonstrate SAMD's effectiveness through case studies on five FDA-cleared medical devices, showcasing its ability to identify vulnerable points and potential attack paths. We find that SAMD has 100% precision in identifying target device technologies in the case studies' documents, retrieves the known vulnerabilities linked to them (with 63.2% precision), and generates highly relevant attack scenarios on the ML model, including detailed steps that an adversary might take (with 95.3% accuracy, and the highest time taken being 191.64s).

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes