Same Evidence, Different Answers: Canonical-Context On-Policy Distillation for Multi-Turn Language Models
Addresses multi-turn inconsistency in LLMs, a practical problem for conversational AI; method is novel and shows strong cross-domain generalization.
LLMs fail when instructions are spread across turns due to self-anchored drift. CCOPD aligns multi-turn student behavior with full-context teacher, achieving 32% average relative improvement in raw-sharded performance across math and five zero-shot out-of-domain tasks while preserving full-context accuracy.
Large language models (LLMs) often solve a task when all instructions are given in a single prompt, but fail when the same information is revealed gradually across turns. When a clean FULL prompt and a RAW-SHARDED conversation contain the same complete user evidence, the model should still arrive at the same answer. We argue that a key reason for this gap is self-anchored drift: responses produced under partial information introduce unsupported assumptions, and those assumptions later distort the final answer. To reduce this effect, we propose Canonical-Context On-Policy Distillation (CCOPD). During training, the same base model is used in two roles: a frozen teacher conditioned on the clean FULL prompt and a trainable student that receives the same evidence incrementally through a multi-turn conversation; CCOPD aligns the student's behavior on its own trajectories with the teacher's canonical full-context behavior. Trained only on math problem conversations, CCOPD yields a 32\% average relative improvement in RAW-SHARDED performance over the original base model across math and five zero-shot out-of-domain task families, while largely preserving full-context performance. Further analyses suggest that CCOPD strengthens grounding in user evidence and reduces sensitivity to contamination from earlier assistant turns.