GTMay 30

Algorithms and Complexity of Influence Maximization on Directed Acyclic Graphs

arXiv:2606.0058530.7h-index: 3
Predicted impact top 32% in GT · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

It clarifies the computational complexity boundaries of influence maximization for network scientists and algorithm designers, showing that DAGs are still hard but tree-like structures are tractable.

The paper proves that influence maximization is APX-hard on DAGs under the LT model, but becomes tractable on arborescences, with exact polynomial-time algorithms for out-arborescences and an FPTAS for in-arborescences under the IC model.

This paper investigates the influence maximization problem under the Independent Cascade(IC) and Linear Threshold (LT) models. While this problem is known to be APX-hard on general graphs, we explore its computational limits by focusing on Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) and more restricted tree structures. Our primary result demonstrates that influence maximization remains APX-hard on DAGs under the LT model, suggesting that the absence of cycles is insufficient to achieve a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS). In contrast, we show that the problem becomes tractable when the topology is further restricted to out-arborescences and in-arborescences. Specifically, for out-arborescences, we show that the IC model and the LT model are equivalent, and we develop exact polynomial-time algorithms based on dynamic programming that leverage the unique path properties of these structures. For in-arborescences, it is known that the problem is polynomial-time solvable under the LT model, and it is NP-hard under the IC model. We complement these results by presenting a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS) for the IC model.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes