Beyond Task-Agnostic: Task-Aware Grouping for Communication-Efficient Multi-Task MoE Inference
For practitioners deploying large MoE models in multi-task serving, this work provides a practical deployment-time optimization that significantly reduces communication costs without sacrificing fairness.
The paper tackles communication overhead and load imbalance in distributed multi-task MoE inference. The proposed TACG framework reduces average communication cost by 31.39% while maintaining near-perfect fairness (Jain index 0.9975) across diverse workloads.
Sparsely activated Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models scale capacity via conditional computation, but distributed inference suffers from cross-GPU expert communication and routing-induced load imbalance. Existing placement methods reduce this cost by co-locating frequently co-activated experts; however, they derive a single deployment plan from globally aggregated routing traces, thereby averaging away the heterogeneous, task-specific co-activation patterns that actually drive communication in multi-task serving. We observe that expert co-activation is strongly task-conditioned: pairs tightly coupled in one task family are often uncorrelated in another, so effective deployment should group experts by task-aware co-activation rather than by a task-agnostic average. Based on this insight, we propose \emph{Task-Aware Coactivation Grouping} (TACG), a deployment-time framework that uses family-specific dispatch and co-activation traces to derive per-expert task-family preferences, reweights the co-activation graph so that intra-family locality dominates grouping, and assigns each expert to a primary GPU under exact capacity constraints. To keep the static placement robust under online workload skew, we further introduce \emph{Generic Expert Shared Replication} (GESR), a lightweight companion that identifies generic experts with consistently central co-activation profiles, replicates them across a small set of secondary GPUs, and applies locality- and load-aware selection at serving time. Experiments on three representative open-source MoE models demonstrate that our framework reduces the average communication cost by 31.39\% over the baseline, while preserving an average Jain fairness index of 0.9975. This advantage persists even under severe distribution shifts in the inference data, consistently outperforming strong baselines.