CVJun 1

InsightVQA: High-Dimensional Emotion-Cognitive Visual Question Answering Benchmark

arXiv:2606.0217169.8
Predicted impact top 43% in CV · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This benchmark addresses the lack of high-quality datasets for grounded emotion understanding and cognitive reasoning in visual question answering, providing a new evaluation standard for the field.

InsightVQA introduces a large-scale benchmark for hierarchical visual question answering on emotion understanding and cognitive reasoning, containing 725K QA pairs from 138K images. The benchmark reveals significant challenges for current models in grounded emotion understanding and reasoning.

Visual emotion understanding requires models not only to recognize emotional states, but also to why they arise and perform higher-level cognitive reasoning. However, existing benchmarks mainly focus on emotion recognition, offering limited support for grounded understanding and response-oriented analysis. To address this gap, we introduce \textbf{InsightVQA}, a large-scale dataset for hierarchical visual question answering on emotion understanding and cognitive reasoning. Building from 351K images collected from six public sources, we apply a rigorous multi-stage filtering pipeline to curate 138K high-confidence images. Each image is annotated at three hierarchical levels: perception QA for emotion and valence recognition, grounded understanding QA constructed from visual trigger extraction through constraint-guided generation, and cognition QA centered on response intent prediction and sequential insight reasoning. In total, InsightVQA contains 725K QA pairs. We further present \textbf{InsightVQA-Bench}, a high-quality evaluation benchmark comprising 30K samples for fine-grained evaluation. To support evaluation, we introduce \textbf{InsightNet}, an emotion-tuned baseline for MLLMs. Results demonstrate that InsightVQA poses significant challenges for grounded emotion understanding and reasoning.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes