Democracy on Rugged Landscapes: Phase Transitions in Optimal Voting Rules

arXiv:2606.028137.2
Predicted impact top 58% in GT · last 90 daysOriginality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

For researchers in computational social choice and collective intelligence, this provides a systematic comparison of voting methods under varying complexity, though the model is abstract and incremental.

This paper models collective governance as optimization on NK fitness landscapes, comparing voting methods across landscape complexity. Borda count achieves the highest mean fitness and lowest variance across most parameter space, with sharp phase transitions in optimal methods.

Laws and institutions shape individual outcomes through complex interactions with citizens' diverse circumstances, yet how different voting methods navigate this coupled landscape remains poorly understood. We model collective governance as optimization on NK fitness landscapes, where shared bits (laws) are updated by voting while individual bits (personal traits) remain fixed. A cross-dependency parameter $α$ controls how legislation's effects depend on individual circumstances. We compare eight standard voting methods and a generalized scoring family across landscape ruggedness $K \in \{1,\ldots,20\}$ and $α\in [0,1]$ with 1000 runs per configuration. Under direct democracy, the optimal voting method undergoes sharp phase transitions as a function of landscape complexity: cardinal score voting dominates on smooth landscapes, ordinal scoring with $p=0.35$ at low-to-moderate ruggedness, Borda count across a wide middle range, and STAR voting at the highest complexity. A two-parameter empirical formula reduces the $(K, α)$ plane to a single complexity axis for visualization. Borda count achieves the highest mean fitness and lowest variance across most of the parameter space. We further introduce a representative democracy model parameterized by identity weight $β$ and candidate self-interest $p_{\mathrm{self}}$. Representation reshapes the complexity-dependent structure even under favorable conditions: cardinal score voting dominates across most regimes, with plurality emerging as the top method at high $β$ and low-to-moderate $p_{\mathrm{self}}$.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes