CVAIJun 2

MUSE: A Unified Agentic Harness for MLLMs

arXiv:2606.0300583.1
AI Analysis

For researchers and practitioners using multimodal LLMs, MUSE demonstrates that significant performance improvements can be obtained by improving the execution scaffold rather than the model itself, highlighting an underexplored design dimension.

MUSE is a unified agentic harness that improves frozen multimodal LLMs by adding modules for task representation, visual processing, tool use, structured parsing, verification, and repair, achieving consistent gains across diverse benchmarks without retraining.

Despite rapid progress, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) still fail on tasks that humans solve effortlessly, such as navigating a grid maze from a screenshot or selecting the correct puzzle piece. Rather than retraining the model, we ask a complementary question: how much capability can be elicited from a frozen MLLM purely by improving the execution scaffold around it? We introduce MUSE, a multimodal unified structured execution harness that wraps any off-the-shelf MLLM with composable modules for task representation, visual processing, perception tool use, structured parsing, deterministic verification, and verifier-guided repair, without any model retraining. We evaluate MUSE across diverse benchmarks spanning visual spatial planning, visual perception, multimodal reasoning, and fine-grained visual discrimination, using multiple state-of-the-art MLLMs. MUSE delivers consistent gains over the bare model in all settings, with the largest jumps on challenging instances. Further analysis reveals that many MLLM failures arise from harness-level shortcomings rather than fundamental model deficits, and can be addressed through verifier-guided repair without touching the model. These findings highlight the agentic multimodal harness as a critical yet underexplored design dimension, offering an orthogonal avenue for improving MLLMs beyond model-centric optimization.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes