CLJun 2

Multilingual Unlearning in LLMs: Transfer, Dynamics, and Reversibility

arXiv:2606.0329188.6
Predicted impact top 46% in CL · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

For researchers and practitioners deploying LLMs globally, it reveals that current unlearning methods are not robust across languages and can be easily reversed.

The paper studies multilingual unlearning in LLMs, finding that unlearning transfer varies by language similarity and that unlearning operates superficially in later layers, allowing recovery of 50-90% of unlearned knowledge via a single steering direction.

Large language models (LLMs) can memorize sensitive facts, motivating unlearning methods that remove targeted knowledge without costly retraining. However, unlearning research remains heavily English-centric. We study multilingual unlearning by extending the TOFU benchmark to five languages, and fine-tune, unlearn, and query our models with different permutations of languages. We find that unlearning transfer, the ability of an unlearned model to "forget" facts in languages other than the unlearning language, is highly variable: e.g., it is strongest between languages sharing scripts and families, and we show that the unlearning language predicts which query languages are most likely to yield the strongest transfer. Layer-wise analysis reveals that unlearning leaves the shared cross-lingual latent space largely intact in early layers, instead operating primarily in later decoding layers. This suggests that unlearning does not truly erase knowledge, but rather induces superficial suppression. Exploiting this structure, a single inference-time steering direction reverses much of this suppression across languages, recovering 50% (Qwen) and 90% (Gemma) of the unlearned knowledge.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes