CGJun 3

Sibley's Guard-Point Convexity Measure: A Perimeter Counterexample and a Dominance Bound

arXiv:2606.050526.2
Predicted impact top 25% in CG · last 90 daysOriginality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

For researchers in convexity measures and shape analysis, this resolves an open question about the relationship between guard-point and perimeter convexity, showing the inequality fails pointwise but holds up to a factor of 2.

The paper disproves the pointwise perimeter inequality for Sibley's guard-point convexity measure using a counterexample pentagon with G(F)=62/63 and P(F)=185/189, but proves a uniform bound G(F) ≤ 2P(F) for all simple polygons.

We study Sibley's guard-point convexity measure for simple polygons and compare it with the exterior and perimeter convexity measures. We prove the exterior inequality G(F) <= E(F) and disprove the pointwise perimeter inequality G(F) <= P(F) by an explicit nonconvex pentagon with G(F) = 62/63 and P(F) = 185/189. Nevertheless, we prove the uniform bound G(F) <= 2P(F) for every simple polygon. Thus the pointwise perimeter inequality is false, but the corresponding asymptotic non-domination conclusion remains true. We also record an auxiliary guard-point-adapted anisotropic perimeter ratio, which isolates the directional loss in the Euclidean perimeter comparison.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes