Hey Chat, Can You Teach Me? Structuring Socratic Dialogue for Human Learning in the Wild
This work addresses the problem of unstructured LLM-based tutoring by introducing a structured curriculum approach, showing that explicit curriculum structure yields gains that scaling alone does not.
Large language models struggle to tutor students over extended sessions because they must simultaneously sequence a curriculum, conduct Socratic dialogue, and infer student knowledge. The authors propose a system that separates these tasks using a prerequisite knowledge graph and a PPO policy for sequencing, achieving higher curriculum mastery rates and fewer turns compared to frontier models and baselines.
Large language models are now widely used for everyday learning, but the underlying interactions are typically unstructured chats rather than following a curriculum. Unlike formal online learning systems, these interactions carry no prior record of the student, so any estimate of what the student already knows must be inferred from the dialogue itself. We show that this gap is not closed by scaling models alone. Frontier and education-tuned LLMs perform poorly when asked to tutor a student over an extended session, because doing so requires three things at once. The tutor must sequence a curriculum, conduct Socratic dialogue, and infer the student's knowledge state from that dialogue. We propose separating these responsibilities. Given a student query, our system constructs a prerequisite knowledge graph in which subtopics are nodes and dependencies are edges, and frames tutoring as deciding which node to teach next and how many dialogue turns to spend on it before moving on. A lightweight PPO policy handles this sequencing decision, while an LLM conducts the Socratic exchange at the chosen node and returns a signal of student progress. Across held-out STEM and non-STEM topics, our PPO-paired tutor outperforms heuristic baselines, frontier general-purpose models, and a model specialised for Socratic dialogue: on both the rate at which students reach full curriculum mastery and the number of turns required. Explicit curriculum structure delivers gains that scaling the underlying model does not.