Distribution-Agnostic Robust Trajectory Optimization via Chance-Constrained Reinforcement Learning
For spacecraft trajectory planning, this work provides a flexible robustification approach that does not require knowledge of the uncertainty distribution, addressing a practical limitation of existing methods.
This paper proposes a distribution-agnostic robust trajectory optimization framework using chance-constrained reinforcement learning, which robustifies a nominal trajectory with an affine correction law. The method achieves competitive upper-tail fuel cost while preserving probabilistic feasibility across Earth-Mars transfer and rocket landing problems, even under unseen uncertainty types.
This paper presents a distribution-agnostic robust trajectory-optimization framework based on chance-constrained reinforcement learning. The uncertainty is represented here through initial conditions and process noise, with the only requirement being that it can be sampled. A deterministic nominal trajectory is first computed offline, and reinforcement learning is then used only to robustify that baseline through a structured affine closed-loop correction law comprising a feedforward control adjustment and time-varying feedback gains. Probabilistic feasibility is enforced empirically through rollout-based upper-tail quantiles, while terminal dispersion is regulated through covariance-feasibility penalties. The framework is assessed on two materially different trajectory design problems. The flagship case study is a three-dimensional multi-impulse Earth-Mars transfer, where the learned policy is benchmarked against a recent robust trajectory-optimization reference under Gaussian uncertainty and then evaluated under bounded uniform uncertainty and under process disturbances not seen during training. The second case study is a stochastic atmospheric pinpoint rocket landing problem, used to assess portability to a short-horizon continuous-thrust setting with drag, mass depletion, and glide-slope constraints. The results show that the proposed framework can remain competitive in upper-tail fuel cost while preserving probabilistic feasibility, and that the same robustification scaffold can be carried across heterogeneous spacecraft trajectory planning problems without redesign of its core stochastic-control structure.