AIJun 15

ARB4WM: An Adversarial Robustness Benchmark for World Models in Continuous Control

arXiv:2606.1660511.2Has Code
Predicted impact top 59% in AI · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This benchmark addresses the lack of standardized adversarial robustness evaluation for world models in safety-critical robotic and control systems.

ARB4WM provides a unified benchmark for evaluating adversarial robustness of world models in continuous control, testing five loss objectives across policy, value, and latent-dynamics levels. Results show that attacks on value, latent representations, and dynamics are as damaging as policy disruption, with early or frequent perturbations being especially harmful.

World models are widely used in robotic and agentic engineering control systems due to their ability to learn latent dynamics for planning and decision-making. As these systems are increasingly deployed in safety-critical settings, understanding their robustness under adversarial conditions has become essential. However, existing evaluations lack a unified benchmark for testing adversarial threats across the policy, value, and latent-dynamics levels of world-model agents. To fill this gap, we present ARB4WM, a unified evaluation framework for pre-deployment robustness and risk assessment of world-model agents under visual perturbations. ARB4WM defines five white-box loss objectives across these three levels and studies their effects when combined with single-step or multi-step perturbation strategies and temporal attack modes, including full-frame, half-sequence, and sparse-frame exposure. Specifically, we evaluate four Dreamer-style agents across 20 tasks from MetaWorld and the DeepMind Control Suite under different loss objectives, perturbation strategies, and temporal attack modes. Results show that attacks targeting value estimation, latent representations, and RSSM dynamics can be as damaging as direct policy disruption, and that early or frequent perturbations are especially harmful, while input-level defenses provide limited recovery under adaptive attacks. These findings suggest that safety, risk, and reliability assessment for world models should cover multiple component-oriented attack objectives and temporal exposure protocols rather than relying solely on action-space robustness. Source code is available at https://github.com/zaoanguai/ARB4WM.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes