LGAILOPLJun 17

VERITAS: Verifier-Guided Proof Search for Zero-Shot Formal Theorem Proving

arXiv:2606.1939912.2
Predicted impact top 28% in LG · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

For researchers in automated theorem proving, VERITAS demonstrates that leveraging rich verifier feedback can significantly improve proof search without training, especially on problems requiring iterative lemma recovery.

VERITAS improves zero-shot formal theorem proving by routing all verifier signals (not just pass/fail) into a two-phase search protocol, achieving 40.6% on miniF2F (vs. 36.9% for Best-of-5) and 7.3% on a new combinatorics benchmark where Best-of-5 only gets 1.8%.

LLM-based formal provers often collapse rich verifier signals (syntax errors, type mismatches, partial goal progress) into a binary pass/fail bit. We present VERITAS, a zero-shot framework that routes every verifier signal back into proof search through a two-phase protocol: Best-of-N sampling first, then a critic-guided MCTS pass that ingests Phase 1 failures as explicit negative examples. The protocol preserves every theorem solved by its own Phase 1 sweep, so Phase 2's additional solves are attributable to feedback-driven exploration. VERITAS reaches 40.6% on miniF2F (vs. an independently run Best-of-5 at 36.9%, Portfolio 26.2%) and 7.3% on VERITAS-CombiBench, a 55-theorem combinatorics benchmark we release on which Best-of-5 (1.8%) falls below Portfolio (3.6%), exposing that unguided sampling hurts when correct lemma names must be recovered iteratively from verifier feedback. Artifacts are available on GitHub.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes