Graph Isomorphism and Representation Theory
For graph isomorphism researchers, this work provides a unified algebraic framework that clarifies the relationship between invariant polynomials, Weisfeiler-Leman, and subgraph counts, with implications for complexity theory.
The paper introduces a method for distinguishing non-isomorphic graphs using separating modules (representations of the symmetric group) and characterizes its power under various complexity measures. Key results include equivalence to subgraph counts for low support-degree, equivalence to Weisfeiler-Leman for symmetric circuit size, and a characterization of multiplicity obstructions via cycle indices of automorphism groups.
We introduce an approach to distinguishing isomorphism types of graphs based on vector spaces of polynomials that are set-wise invariant under permutations ("separating modules," which are representations of the symmetric group), inspired by the Geometric Complexity Theory approach to separating complexity classes (Mulmuley & Sohoni, SIAM J. Comput., 2001). We characterize the power of this method for distinguishing non-isomorphic graphs under several different complexity measures: - We show that separating modules of "support-degree" $k$ (each monomial touches at most $k$ vertices) are equivalent to the counts of $O(k)$-vertex subgraphs. This is strictly weaker than $O(k)$-dimensional Weisfeiler--Leman (Fürer, ICALP '01). - We show that separating modules of symmetric circuit size $n^{Θ(k)}$ are equivalent to $Θ(k)$-WL. This generalizes and strengthens a result of Dawar & Wilsenach (CSL '18; ICALP '20; ACM Trans. Comput. Log., 2022; Theory Comput., 2025): they proved one direction of this equivalence for invariant polynomials; we generalize to separating modules and prove both directions. - When considering only the multiplicities of separating modules (as was proposed in GCT by Mulmuley & Sohoni, ibid., rather than the polynomials themselves), we show that two graphs are separated by multiplicities if and only if their automorphism groups have different cycle indices. The latter result is notable in the analogy with GCT, as it is the only result we are aware of in which the multiplicity approach to separating isomorphism types of objects has been given an "intrinsic" characterization in terms of the objects themselves. We use this to show that for graphs, multiplicity obstructions are stronger than occurrence obstructions. We also connect invariant polynomials to the Graph Reconstruction Conjectures and Forman's "invariants of finite type" (Adv. Math., 2004).