Low-dimensional topology of deep neural networks
For AI researchers, this work introduces topological invariants as a tool to compare architectural expressivity, though the results are theoretical and limited to linking numbers.
This paper uses low-dimensional topology, specifically linking numbers in ℝ³, to compare the expressive power of different neural network architectures. Key findings include that ResNets and transformers are equally powerful and strictly more powerful than feedforward networks with monotonic activations, but nonmonotonic activations elevate feedforward networks to the same class.
We study layered models, including feedforward networks, ResNets, and transformers, by limiting each layer to a width of $d = 3$, i.e., $\mathbb{R}^3$ as representation space. This allows us to track how a neural network changes low-dimensional topological invariants through its layers. Just about any topological structure may be simplified or even trivialized by simply increasing dimension; e.g., any knot is equivalent to an unknot in $\mathbb{R}^4$. By restricting to $\mathbb{R}^3$, we not only isolate the effects of activation and depth from that of width, we work in a space that lends itself to easy visualization. We focus on linking number here, deferring other invariants like link groups, Milnor's $\barμ$-invariants, knot types, ambient cobordisms, to a sequel. We provide full proofs and empirical experiments to justify the following insights: When measured by their power to effect changes in linking numbers, the layer-skipping feature in ResNets is as powerful as the attention mechanism in transformers; both ResNets and transformers are strictly more powerful than feedforward neural networks with monotonic activations, which are in turn more powerful than invertible and flow-based models; but replacing monotonic activation with a nonmonotonic one elevates a feedforward network into the same expressivity class as ResNets and transformers. These results suggest that low-dimensional topology can be a useful tool to guide designs of AI architectures. We also generalize our results from $d = 3$ to arbitrary $d > 3$.