CLJul 1

Low Perplexity is Repetition: A One-Dimensional Self-Conditioning Attractor in Continuous Diffusion LMs

arXiv:2607.0058818.31 citations
Predicted impact top 33% in CL · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

Identifies and fixes a critical flaw in continuous diffusion LMs that inflates quality metrics, enabling fairer evaluation and more efficient generation.

Continuous diffusion language models like ELF achieve low generative perplexity by repeating text, which Gen-PPL rewards. Removing repetition raises Gen-PPL from 19.5 to 27.7; the proposed ACE fix reduces repetition to near-human levels with 1.5–5× lower compute cost.

Continuous diffusion language models such as ELF report record-low generative perplexity (Gen-PPL). We find a catch: these models repeat far more than human text, and Gen-PPL rewards rather than penalizes that repetition, so its low scores overstate quality. Strip the repetition and ELF-B's Gen-PPL rises from $19.5$ to $27.7$; the smallest model even posts the best Gen-PPL because it repeats most. We trace the repetition to its source: a contractive attractor along a \emph{single direction} in the self-conditioning feedback loop, the loop that feeds each step's clean estimate into the next. Because the failure is one-dimensional, a one-dimensional fix suffices, and we propose one. \textbf{ACE} (Attractor-Contrast-Escape) subtracts that single, label-free direction from the feedback at each step. Estimated once on the $105$M model, the direction cuts repetition to near the human level while keeping quality competitive, and transfers near-unchanged to the $342$M and $652$M models and across samplers; the same recipe recovers useful directions on other architectures. Since Gen-PPL itself rewards repetition, we instead measure the compute each fix needs to produce human-clean text, where ACE is $1.5$--$5\times$ cheaper.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes