Diffeomorphic Optimization
Provides a principled framework for optimizing differentiable objectives on low-dimensional manifolds, with strong empirical gains in protein design tasks.
Diffeomorphic optimization enables gradient descent on data manifolds by leveraging diffusion/flow models to map to a simpler base space, achieving Riemannian-like updates. For protein design, it improves secondary-structure targeting to 91.3% (vs. 63.3%), outperforms OC-Flow on peptide binding at 2× speed, and reduces Rosetta energies by thousands of units.
Generative models learn data distributions that reside on a low-dimensional manifold within a higher-dimensional ambient space. Optimizing differentiable objectives on this manifold is challenging: the ambient loss landscape is high-dimensional, rugged, and non-convex. Direct gradient descent, blind to the manifold's geometry, quickly drifts off it. Diffeomorphic optimization starts from the observation that diffusion and flow models provide a map from the data manifold to a much simpler base space in which we perform gradient descent. Using differential geometry, we show this is equivalent to Riemannian gradient descent on the data manifold up to $\mathcal{O}(λ^2)$ corrections, keeping trajectories on-manifold by construction and yielding a smoother optimization surface. For protein design, we extend diffeomorphic optimization to the matrix Lie groups $\mathrm{SO}(3)$ and $\mathrm{SE}(3)$, deriving an autograd-compatible $\mathrm{SO}(3)$ gradient and a generalized adjoint-state method for backpropagation through Lie-group ODE solvers. Diffeomorphic optimization improves over tuned guidance on secondary-structure targeting with FrameFlow ($91.3\%$ vs. $63.3\%$ of residues in the Ramachandran target), outperforms OC-Flow on peptide binding affinity at $2\times$ the speed, and reduces Rosetta energies by thousands of units across the PDB test set for structures with hundreds of residues.