LEXIC: Lightweight Eye-tracking eXtension via Injected Complexity

arXiv:2607.081525.1h-index: 1
Predicted impact top 95% in CL · last 90 daysOriginality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

Incremental improvement for gaze-only reading comprehension prediction, showing modest gains on unseen text and readers.

LEXIC improves gaze-only reading comprehension prediction by injecting word-level difficulty signals (GPT-2 surprisal, frequency, length) into per-fixation input, achieving +1.8 to +2.9 AUROC gains on EyeBench's OneStop task over the AhnCNN baseline.

On the recent EyeBench benchmark, predicting reading comprehension from eye movements exposes a stark gap: text-aware models using pretrained language models reach 56--63% AUROC, while gaze-only models operate at chance. We ask how far a gaze-only model can be pushed by lightweight, language-model-free conditioning. Building on the EyeBench AhnCNN baseline, LEXIC-Base, we propose two mechanisms to inject three precomputed word-level difficulty signals, GPT-2 surprisal, word frequency, and word length, into the per-fixation input: direct concatenation, LEXIC-Concat, and a residual mechanism, LEXIC-Res, where a small head predicts typical-reader gaze response and the encoder is conditioned on the deviation. On the OneStop reading comprehension task, with K=5 seed-ensemble training across ten folds, both mechanisms produce statistically consistent AUROC gains on Unseen Text, +1.8 to +2.2 percentage points, Wilcoxon p <= 0.065. LEXIC-Concat additionally lifts Unseen Reader by +2.9 percentage points, p = 0.010. We trace an architectural boundary in LEXIC-Res on Unseen Reader, +1.8 percentage points, p = 0.19, to the prediction head being calibrated to training readers, transferring imperfectly to out-of-distribution readers.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes