A Shared Latent for Partially-Labeled Multi-Task Facial Affect Recognition
For researchers in affective computing, this provides a principled method to leverage partially labeled multi-task data without imputation, showing representational gains for rare classes.
The authors tackle partially-labeled multi-task facial affect recognition by introducing a shared variational latent bottleneck that marginalizes over missing labels, enabling cross-task signal transfer. On s-Aff-Wild2, this lifts expression macro-F1 from 0.403 to 0.446, outperforming masked-loss models, while valence-arousal remains within noise.
Facial affect in the wild is naturally multi-task: valence-arousal, discrete expressions, and facial action units describe the same face. Yet real corpora annotate these tasks only partially and unevenly, so most systems mask the missing labels or impute pseudo-labels and forgo the cross-task signal. We instead cast partially-labeled multi-task learning as marginalization over a shared affect latent: one variational bottleneck mediates all three task decoders, so a frame annotated for one task shapes the representation the others use, and the masked objective reappears as the reconstruction term of an evidence lower bound. On s-Aff-Wild2, where only 37% of frames carry all three labels, the classes are severely imbalanced, and pretraining on the source data is disallowed, we isolate where this coupling acts. On a single backbone it lifts expression macro-F1 from 0.403 for a dedicated specialist to 0.446, which the masked-loss model does not reach; a second, near-peer backbone with decorrelated errors then breaks an action-unit ceiling that external action-unit data could not, while valence-arousal stays within noise. Every gain is disciplined by a matched-control negative; together these controls indicate that the rare-class failure is representational, not a matter of loss shaping. As each task's source is chosen on the evaluation split, we report the assembled result, a combined multi-task score of 1.679 on validation, as an in-sample endpoint and rest our conclusions on the controlled comparisons; a small, regime-dependent transfer of the expression advantage to AffectNet and RAF-DB is presented as exploratory rather than conclusive.