CLAILGJul 22

Reference-Free Evaluation of Reasoning in Open-Ended Question Answering

arXiv:2607.1967824.9Has Code
Predicted impact top 7% in CL · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

For practitioners in high-stakes domains needing to verify multi-step reasoning in LLM outputs, this work provides a more reliable reference-free evaluation method than existing LLM-as-judge approaches.

The paper proposes a reference-free framework for auditing LLM reasoning traces by decomposing them into segments, labeling local premise-target relations via NLI, and organizing them into a hypergraph for deterministic backward AND-OR search. The method outperforms LLM-as-judge baselines in deductive mathematical reasoning and open-ended medical reasoning, particularly in identifying problematic reasoning segments.

AI-generated answers in high-stakes domains are often fluent but difficult to verify, especially when they contain multi-step reasoning rather than a single final answer. We propose a reasoning-based, reference-free framework for auditing LLM-generated outputs. The method decomposes a generated reasoning trace into segments, labels local premise-target relations using Natural Language Inference (NLI), and organizes these relations into a hypergraph. A deterministic backward AND-OR search then assigns segment-level audit labels that indicate how each segment is grounded within the generated response. We evaluate the framework in two settings: deductive mathematical reasoning with Hard2Verify, and open-ended medical reasoning with UroReason, a new physician-annotated benchmark of LLM reasoning traces from real clinical cases. Across these settings, our NLI-hypergraph audit provides a more reliable reference-free evaluation signal than direct LLM-as-judge baselines. In the clinical setting, state-of-the-art LLM judges often fail to identify problematic reasoning segments, over-accepting fluent but weakly grounded responses. Our results show that QA evaluation should account for how inferential relations compose across a reasoning trace, rather than relying only on final answers or LLMs as verifiers. UroReason will be made available through an API, and our code will be released as open source.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes