CRAILGJul 30

Driving up Inference Energy on SNNs: Per-Sample and Universal Sponge Attacks

arXiv:2607.279906.2
Predicted impact top 59% in CR · last 90 daysOriginality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This work highlights a new security vulnerability in energy-efficient SNNs, which is important for developers of always-on edge systems relying on neuromorphic hardware.

The paper demonstrates that Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) are vulnerable to sponge attacks that increase inference energy consumption by inflating spike activity and synaptic workload. They develop per-sample attacks that increase SynOps by 1.5-2.6x and universal attacks that increase by 1.09-1.24x across three datasets, with estimated per-inference energy overheads up to 13.24 mJ.

Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) communicate through sparse binary spike events rather than dense activations, enabling energy-efficient inference on neuromorphic hardware and motivating their use in always-on, battery-powered edge systems. We show that this same efficiency advantage creates a distinct security risk: sponge attacks can increase inference-time spike activity and synaptic workload, inflating energy consumption while remaining difficult to detect through correctness-based monitoring alone. Prior input-space efficiency attacks on SNNs have focused on per-sample optimization, primarily in rate-coded settings. We extend this threat to native event-based binary inputs and study two attack models. First, we develop a per-sample sponge attack that crafts a custom adversarial spike train for each input via gradient-based optimization. This attack increases per-inference SynOps by 1.5-2.6x on three SNN models for the NMNIST, SHD, and IBM DVS Gesture datasets, while preserving the predicted class on at least 98% of evaluated samples. Second, to the best of our knowledge, we introduce the first universal sponge attack for native event-based SNN inputs: a fixed binary perturbation computed offline and applied via XOR to all subsequent inputs. Although weaker, it still inflates SynOps by 1.09-1.24x across all three datasets and represents a more realistic deployment threat because it requires no per-input optimization. Mapping SynOp inflation to estimated Loihi-1 energy yields per-inference overheads from 14 $μ$J to 13.24 mJ. These results show that native event-based SNNs are vulnerable to practical input-space efficiency attacks, and that reusable universal perturbations can accumulate into meaningful battery drain in continuously deployed edge systems.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes