CLAug 5

Reasoning Core: Designing Broad Procedural Data for Completion-Supervised Reasoning Training

arXiv:2608.0514817.4
Predicted impact top 37% in CL · last 90 daysOriginality Highly original
AI Analysis

This work provides a new, high-quality dataset and methodology for researchers and practitioners aiming to improve the reasoning capabilities of language models, offering a substantial gain over existing procedural data.

The authors introduce Reasoning Core, a collection of 50 procedural generators for reasoning problems, and demonstrate its effectiveness in completion-supervised fine-tuning. In a 3B model comparison, Reasoning Core achieved the highest mean scores on DROP, LogiQA, and ARC-Challenge, outperforming both a baseline without procedural data and three alternative procedural collections.

Procedural generators produce useful verifiable reasoning problems at scale, but have received less attention as data for completion-supervised fine-tuning. We introduce Reasoning Core, a collection of 50 generators spanning mathematics, logic, planning, state tracking, formal languages, structured data, games, causality, and code, with semantic scorers, difficulty controls, and task evaluators. Under a matched completion-supervised protocol, we compare Reasoning Core with Procedural Warmup, Reasoning Gym, and SynLogic across four base-model settings and multiple training durations. In the primary 3B comparison, Reasoning Core achieves the highest mean scores on DROP, LogiQA, and ARC-Challenge, exceeding both the baseline without procedural data and all three alternative procedural collections. Task-level analyses show that semantic validity alone does not ensure training utility, highlighting compact targets and calibrated difficulty as important design factors. We ran audits combining model-assisted review, human adjudication, and regression testing. Applied throughout Reasoning Core development and to the other collections, they reveal subtle mismatches among generation, rendering, targets, and scoring, a reminder that procedural generation alone does not guarantee correctness. The library, generated datasets, and audit material are publicly available.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes