Javad Dogani

Naicheng Li, Javad Dogani, Rui Wang et al.

Traditional federated learning (FL) relies on a central aggregator server, which can create performance bottlenecks and privacy risks. Decentralized mix-and-forward designs remove the server, but repeated local mixing can attenuate global information under heterogeneity and exposes peer-to-peer neighborhoods as a privacy attack surface. To preserve FedAvg-style aggregation semantics (over updates reconstructable by the round deadline) while scaling dissemination, we present FLTorrent, a BitTorrent-based dissemination layer for serverless FL with a short warm-up. Warm-up hardens within-round source unlinkability -- a dissemination-layer goal orthogonal to content protections (e.g., DP or secure aggregation) -- via (i) pre-round obfuscation, (ii) randomized lags, and (iii) coordination-only non-owner-first scheduling (tracker off the data path), before switching to vanilla BitTorrent swarming. We upper-bound the per-transfer attribution posterior by the fraction of owner chunks in a sender's eligible cover set, and derive a tighter high-probability bound that improves with early non-owner mass. A simple heuristic, GreedyFastestFirst, attains approximately 92% of a bandwidth-optimal max-flow upper bound, while warm-up remains a stable approximately 12% share of a round across 100--500 peers. Under an observation-only local adversary, FLTorrent drives attribution success close to neighborhood-level random guessing for typical nodes, improves with network size, and remains robust under collusion. In LLM-scale stress tests (Gemma-7B, DeepSeek-R1-14B, Qwen2.5-32B, and Llama-3.3-70B) over 7--10 Gbps access links, FLTorrent adds only approximately 6--10% end-to-end overhead relative to BitTorrent-only. Overall, FLTorrent shows that within-round unlinkability and BitTorrent-level efficiency can co-exist with predictable, low overheads at scale.

Behafarid Hemmatpour, Javad Dogani, Nikolaos Laoutaris

In dense metropolitan areas, searching for street parking adds to traffic congestion. Like many other problems, real-time assistants based on mobile phones have been proposed, but their effectiveness is understudied. This work quantifies how varying levels of user coordination and information availability through such apps impact search time and the probability of finding street parking. Through a data-driven simulation of Madrid's street parking ecosystem, we analyze four distinct strategies: uncoordinated search (Unc-Agn), coordinated parking without awareness of non-users (Cord-Agn), an idealized oracle system that knows the positions of all non-users (Cord-Oracle), and our novel/practical Cord-Approx strategy that estimates non-users' behavior probabilistically. The Cord-Approx strategy, instead of requiring knowledge of how close non-users are to a certain spot in order to decide whether to navigate toward it, uses past occupancy distributions to elongate physical distances between system users and alternative parking spots, and then solves a Hungarian matching problem to dispatch accordingly. In high-fidelity simulations of Madrid's parking network with real traffic data, users of Cord-Approx averaged 6.69 minutes to find parking, compared to 19.98 minutes for non-users without an app. A zone-level snapshot shows that Cord-Approx reduces search time for system users by 72% (range = 67-76%) in central hubs, and up to 73% in residential areas, relative to non-users.