LGMar 3
Graph Hopfield Networks: Energy-Based Node Classification with Associative MemoryAbinav Rao, Alex Wa, Rishi Athavale
We introduce Graph Hopfield Networks, whose energy function couples associative memory retrieval with graph Laplacian smoothing for node classification. Gradient descent on this joint energy yields an iterative update interleaving Hopfield retrieval with Laplacian propagation. Memory retrieval provides regime-dependent benefits: up to 2.0~pp on sparse citation networks and up to 5 pp additional robustness under feature masking; the iterative energy-descent architecture itself is a strong inductive bias, with all variants (including the memory-disabled NoMem ablation) outperforming standard baselines on Amazon co-purchase graphs. Tuning enables graph sharpening for heterophilous benchmarks without architectural changes.
84.4CLMar 19
Correct Chains, Wrong Answers: Dissociating Reasoning from Output in LLM LogicAbinav Rao, Sujan Rachuri, Nikhil Vemuri
LLMs can execute every step of chain-of-thought reasoning correctly and still produce wrong final answers. We introduce the Novel Operator Test, a benchmark that separates operator logic from operator name, enabling rigorous distinction between genuine reasoning and pattern retrieval. By evaluating Boolean operators under unfamiliar names across depths 1-10 on five models (up to 8,100 problems each), we demonstrate a reasoning-output dissociation that existing benchmarks cannot detect. At Claude Sonnet 4's depth 7, all 31 errors have verifiably correct reasoning yet wrong declared answers; 17/19 errors in mixed-operator chains exhibit the same pattern. The benchmark reveals two failure types: strategy failures at depth 2, where models attempt terse retrieval (+62pp from scaffolding), and content failures at depth 7, where models reason fully but err systematically (+8-30pp, 0/300 errors post-intervention). A Trojan operator (XOR's truth table under a novel name) confirms name alone does not gate reasoning (p >= 0.49), while Llama's novelty gap widens to 28pp at depth 8-9 with the Trojan at 92-100%, isolating genuine difficulty with novel logic from name unfamiliarity.
47.7LGMar 17
Do Understanding and Generation Fight? A Diagnostic Study of DPO for Unified Multimodal ModelsAbinav Rao, Sujan Rachuri
Unified multimodal models share a language model backbone for both understanding and generating images. Can DPO align both capabilities simultaneously? We present the first systematic study of this question, applying DPO to Janus-Pro at 1B and 7B parameters under seven training strategies and two post-hoc methods. The central finding is negative: generation quality resists DPO alignment across all tested conditions on this architecture. No method improves generation CLIPScore at 7B (|Delta| < 0.2, p > 0.5 at n=200 per seed, 3 seeds); at 1B, all methods degrade generation, and the result holds across preference data types (real-vs-generated and model-vs-model) and the data volumes tested (150-288 pairs). Gradient analysis reveals why: understanding and generation gradients are near-orthogonal (cos ~ 0) with ~11-14x magnitude imbalance driven by VQ token count asymmetry (576 generation tokens vs. ~30-100 text tokens). This imbalance is the dominant interference mechanism in multi-task DPO; magnitude-balancing yields directionally positive understanding deltas (+0.01-0.04 VQA, though individually not significant), but the generation gap persists regardless. We identify discrete VQ tokenization as a likely structural bottleneck -- supported by the generation DPO loss converging to ln(2) -- and provide practical guidance for practitioners working with VQ-based unified models.