Lindah Kotut

Lindah Kotut, Timothy L. Stelter, Michael Horning et al.

There is an increased sensitivity by people about how companies collect information about them, and how this information is packaged, used and sold. This perceived lack of control is highlighted by the helplessness of users of various platforms in managing or halting what data is collected from/about them. In a future where users have wrested control of their data and have the autonomy to decide what information is collected, how it is used and most importantly, how much it is worth, a new market emerges. This design fiction considers possible steps prescient companies would take to meet these demands, such as providing third-party subscription platforms offering personal data trade as a service. These services would provide a means for transparent transactions that preserve an owner's control over their data; allowing them to individually make decisions about what data they avail for sale, and the amount of compensation they would accept in trade.

Lindah Kotut, Michael Horning, Derek Haqq et al.

This paper compares the needs of groups and communities in outdoor settings, seeking to identify subtle but important differences in the ways that their needs can be supported. We first examine the questions of who uses technology in outdoor settings, what their technological uses and needs are, and what conflicts exist between different trail users regarding technology use and experience. We then consider selected categories of people to understand their distinct needs when acting as groups and as communities. We conclude that it is important to explore the tensions between groups and communities to identify design opportunities.

Lindah Kotut, Michael Horning, Steve Harrison et al.

This paper examines the question of who technology users on the trail are, what their technological uses and needs are, and what conflicts exist between different trail users regarding technology use and experience, toward understanding how experiences of trail users contribute to designers. We argue that exploring these tensions provide opportunities for design that can be used to both mitigate conflicts and improve community on the trail.