Shin'ichi Konomi

Boxuan Ma, Baofeng Ren, Huiyong Li et al.

Generative AI tools are increasingly used for coursework help, shifting much of students' help-seeking and reasoning into student-AI chats that are largely invisible to instructors. This loss of visibility can weaken instructors' ability to understand students' difficulties, ensure alignment with course goals, and uphold course policies. Yet transcript-level access is neither scalable nor ethically straightforward: reading raw chat logs across a class is impractical, and exposing detailed dialogue can raise privacy concerns and chilling effects on help seeking. As a result, instructors face a tension between needing actionable insight and avoiding default surveillance of student conversations. To address this gap, we propose a meta-reflective dashboard that makes student-AI sessions interpretable without exposing raw chat logs by default. After each help-seeking session, a reflection AI produces a structured, session-level summary of the student's interaction trajectory, AI usage patterns, and potential risks. We co-designed the dashboard with instructors and students to surface key challenges and design goals, and conducted a formative evaluation of perceived usefulness, trust in the summaries, and privacy acceptability. Findings suggest that the proposed dashboard can reduce instructors' sensemaking effort while mitigating privacy concerns associated with transcript-level access, and they also yield design implications for evidence, governance, and scalable class-level analytics for AI-supported learning.

Boxuan Ma, Yinjie Xie, Huiyong Li et al.

AI-powered coding assistants can support students in programming courses by providing on-demand explanations and debugging help. However, existing research often focuses on individual tools, leaving a gap in evidence-based design recommendations that reflect both educator and student perspectives in education settings. To ground the design of learning-oriented AI coding assistants for both sides' needs, we conducted parallel surveys of educators (N=50) and students (N=90) to compare preferences about (i) how students should request help, (ii) how AI should respond, and (iii) who should control. Our results show that educators generally favored indirect scaffolding that preserves students' reasoning, whereas students were more likely to prefer direct, actionable help. Educators further highlighted the need for course-aligned constraints and instructor-facing oversight, while students emphasized timely support and clarity when stuck. Based on these findings, we discuss the interaction-focused design space and derive design implications for learning-oriented AI coding assistants, highlighting scaffolding and control mechanisms that balance students' agency with instructional constraints.

Boxuan Ma, Huiyong Li, Gen Li et al.

Generative AI (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT now provide novice programmers with instant, personalized support and are reshaping computing education. While a growing body of work examines AI's immediate impacts, longitudinal evidence remains limited on how students' awareness, student-AI interaction patterns, and course outcomes evolve as AI becomes routine in classrooms. To address this gap, we investigate an introductory Python course across three successive AI-supported cohorts (2023-2025). Using questionnaires, coded student-AI dialogue logs, and course assessment records, we examine cohort-to-cohort shifts in students' AI awareness, interaction practices, and learning outcomes. We find that students' relationships with GenAI change systematically over time: familiarity and uptake become increasingly normative, and help-seeking practices evolve alongside growing AI literacy and shifting expectations of what the assistant should provide. These changes suggest that, in the AI era, the central instructional challenge is less about whether students use AI and more about how courses redefine productive learning practices while maintaining student agency. Our study offers longitudinal evidence and practical implications for designing and integrating AI programming support in course settings.

Boxuan Ma, Huiyong Li, Gen Li et al.

Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT now provide novice programmers with unprecedented access to instant, personalized support. While this holds clear promise, their influence on students' metacognitive processes remains underexplored. Existing work has largely focused on correctness and usability, with limited attention to whether and how students' use of AI assistants supports or bypasses key metacognitive processes. This study addresses that gap by analyzing student-AI interactions through a metacognitive lens in university-level programming courses. We examined more than 10,000 dialogue logs collected over three years, complemented by surveys of students and educators. Our analysis focused on how prompts and responses aligned with metacognitive phases and strategies. Synthesizing these findings across data sources, we distill design considerations for AI-powered coding assistants that aim to support rather than supplant metacognitive engagement. Our findings provide guidance for developing educational AI tools that strengthen students' learning processes in programming education.

Boxaun Ma, Li Chen, Shin'ichi Konomi

The integration of ChatGPT as a supportive tool in education, notably in programming courses, addresses the unique challenges of programming education by providing assistance with debugging, code generation, and explanations. Despite existing research validating ChatGPT's effectiveness, its application in university-level programming education and a detailed understanding of student interactions and perspectives remain limited. This paper explores ChatGPT's impact on learning in a Python programming course tailored for first-year students over eight weeks. By analyzing responses from surveys, open-ended questions, and student-ChatGPT dialog data, we aim to provide a comprehensive view of ChatGPT's utility and identify both its advantages and limitations as perceived by students. Our study uncovers a generally positive reception toward ChatGPT and offers insights into its role in enhancing the programming education experience. These findings contribute to the broader discourse on AI's potential in education, suggesting paths for future research and application.

Boxuan Ma, Md Akib Zabed Khan, Tianyuan Yang et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant strides in natural language processing and are increasingly being integrated into recommendation systems. However, their potential in educational recommendation systems has yet to be fully explored. This paper investigates the use of LLMs as a general-purpose recommendation model, leveraging their vast knowledge derived from large-scale corpora for course recommendation tasks. We explore a variety of approaches, ranging from prompt-based methods to more advanced fine-tuning techniques, and compare their performance against traditional recommendation models. Extensive experiments were conducted on a real-world MOOC dataset, evaluating using LLMs as course recommendation systems across key dimensions such as accuracy, diversity, and novelty. Our results demonstrate that LLMs can achieve good performance comparable to traditional models, highlighting their potential to enhance educational recommendation systems. These findings pave the way for further exploration and development of LLM-based approaches in the context of educational recommendations.

Tomoyo Sasao, Shin'ichi Konomi, Masatoshi Arikawa et al.

We developed a prototype of touch-based survey tool for tablets and conducted an experiment to compare interaction patterns of touch-based, PC-based, and paper-based questionnaires. Our findings suggest that a touch-based interface allows users to complete ranking questions easily, quickly, and accurately although it can increase the time to complete a location input task for well-known, prominent locations.

Shin'ichi Konomi

Existing digital technologies in urban settings tend to focus narrowly on concerns around wayfinding, safety, and consumption. In this paper, we examine pedestrian experiences based on the data collected through field observations as well as intensive interviews with nine pedestrians in the Shibuya area of Tokyo, and suggest an alternative approach to blending technologies and urban activities. Our focus is on social and cognitive aspects of pedestrians who get lost and explore a labyrinth of sidewalks. We use the data to discuss the activities that are often ignored or inadequately supported by existing systems.