3.0CRJan 7
Deontic Knowledge Graphs for Privacy Compliance in Multimodal Disaster Data SharingKelvin Uzoma Echenim, Karuna Pande Joshi
Disaster response requires sharing heterogeneous artifacts, from tabular assistance records to UAS imagery, under overlapping privacy mandates. Operational systems often reduce compliance to binary access control, which is brittle in time-critical workflows. We present a novel deontic knowledge graph-based framework that integrates a Disaster Management Knowledge Graph (DKG) with a Policy Knowledge Graph (PKG) derived from IoT-Reg and FEMA/DHS privacy drivers. Our release decision function supports three outcomes: Allow, Block, and Allow-with-Transform. The latter binds obligations to transforms and verifies post-transform compliance via provenance-linked derived artifacts; blocked requests are logged as semantic privacy incidents. Evaluation on a 5.1M-triple DKG with 316K images shows exact-match decision correctness, sub-second per-decision latency, and interactive query performance across both single-graph and federated workloads.
18.2AIJun 17
Deontic Policies for Runtime Governance of Agentic AI SystemsAnupam Joshi, Tim Finin, Karuna Pande Joshi et al.
Autonomous agentic AI systems driven by Large Language Models (LLMs) introduce a new class of security, privacy, and compliance challenges: an agent that can invoke tools, manipulate data, install software, and coordinate with peer agents across organizational boundaries must be constrained not just by authentication and access control, but by the full structure of enterprise governance. This includes specifying what agents are permitted and prohibited from doing, what they areobliged to do after certain actions (e.g., notify the CISO), under what conditions a standing obligation may be waived, and which rules take precedence when policies conflict. This governance problem exceeds what current policy engines provide. Systems such as XACML, Rego, and Cedar address only the permit/prohibit subset of this governance structure. They do not provide obligation lifecycle management, meta-policy conflict resolution, dispensations that waive obligations in specific circumstances, and ontological reasoning over domain class hierarchies commonly found in applications such as healthcare, cybersecurity, or data privacy. We propose AgenticRei, which realizes key governance requirements such as obligations, dispensations, policy conflict resolutions, and reasoning over policies, as well as the basic permit/prohibit constraints. We use a deontic policy language built on the Rei framework, expressed as OWL (Web Ontology Language) and evaluated at runtime by a high-performance logic engine entirely outside the LLM. The same pipeline governs both tool invocations by the agent and agent-to-agent messages. We show through examples that deontic policies capture governance constraints around security and privacy that mostly cannot be expressed in current production engines. Our approach composes naturally with industry-standard frameworks like A2AS.
IRJun 14
LLM based Knowledge Graph Approach to Automating Medical Device Regulatory ComplianceSubhankar Chattoraj, Karuna Pande Joshi
Advanced medical devices increasingly rely on AI-driven frameworks to automate compliance processes, ensuring safety and efficacy while reducing regulatory burdens. In the United States, software-based medical devices, including those utilizing AI/ML models, are regulated by the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) under the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 21. These regulations are extensive, cross-referenced documents that require significant human effort to parse, leading to high compliance costs for manufacturers. We propose a novel, semantically rich framework that extracts regulatory knowledge from FDA documents and translates it into a machine-processable format. Our system encodes regulatory knowledge into an OWL/RDF-based knowledge graph and uses the Mistral 7B Instruct model to dynamically generate SPARQL queries, perform compliance reasoning, and produce structured reports. This enables automated device classification (Class I, II, or III) and real-time regulatory evaluation. Validated through real-world use cases, our framework significantly reduces manual review effort, enhances interpretability, and accelerates time-to-market. The proposed approach integrates AI reasoning and semantic technologies to achieve scalable, transparent, and automated regulatory compliance.
5.8CRAug 1, 2018
Cognitive Techniques for Early Detection of Cybersecurity EventsSandeep Narayanan, Ashwinkumar Ganesan, Karuna Joshi et al.
The early detection of cybersecurity events such as attacks is challenging given the constantly evolving threat landscape. Even with advanced monitoring, sophisticated attackers can spend as many as 146 days in a system before being detected. This paper describes a novel, cognitive framework that assists a security analyst by exploiting the power of semantically rich knowledge representation and reasoning with machine learning techniques. Our Cognitive Cybersecurity system ingests information from textual sources, and various agents representing host and network-based sensors, and represents this information in a knowledge graph. This graph uses terms from an extended version of the Unified Cybersecurity Ontology. The system reasons over the knowledge graph to derive better actionable intelligence to security administrators, thus decreasing their cognitive load and increasing their confidence in the system. We have developed a proof of concept framework for our approach and demonstrate its capabilities using a custom-built ransomware instance that is similar to WannaCry.
1.3CLJul 19, 2018
Using Deep Neural Networks to Translate Multi-lingual Threat IntelligencePriyanka Ranade, Sudip Mittal, Anupam Joshi et al.
The multilingual nature of the Internet increases complications in the cybersecurity community's ongoing efforts to strategically mine threat intelligence from OSINT data on the web. OSINT sources such as social media, blogs, and dark web vulnerability markets exist in diverse languages and hinder security analysts, who are unable to draw conclusions from intelligence in languages they don't understand. Although third party translation engines are growing stronger, they are unsuited for private security environments. First, sensitive intelligence is not a permitted input to third party engines due to privacy and confidentiality policies. In addition, third party engines produce generalized translations that tend to lack exclusive cybersecurity terminology. In this paper, we address these issues and describe our system that enables threat intelligence understanding across unfamiliar languages. We create a neural network based system that takes in cybersecurity data in a different language and outputs the respective English translation. The English translation can then be understood by an analyst, and can also serve as input to an AI based cyber-defense system that can take mitigative action. As a proof of concept, we have created a pipeline which takes Russian threats and generates its corresponding English, RDF, and vectorized representations. Our network optimizes translations on specifically, cybersecurity data.
2.5CROct 15, 2017
Link Before You Share: Managing Privacy Policies through BlockchainAgniva Banerjee, Karuna Pande Joshi
With the advent of numerous online content providers, utilities and applications, each with their own specific version of privacy policies and its associated overhead, it is becoming increasingly difficult for concerned users to manage and track the confidential information that they share with the providers. Users consent to providers to gather and share their Personally Identifiable Information (PII). We have developed a novel framework to automatically track details about how a users' PII data is stored, used and shared by the provider. We have integrated our Data Privacy ontology with the properties of blockchain, to develop an automated access control and audit mechanism that enforces users' data privacy policies when sharing their data across third parties. We have also validated this framework by implementing a working system LinkShare. In this paper, we describe our framework on detail along with the LinkShare system. Our approach can be adopted by Big Data users to automatically apply their privacy policy on data operations and track the flow of that data across various stakeholders.