AIMAJun 17

Deontic Policies for Runtime Governance of Agentic AI Systems

arXiv:2606.1946418.2
Predicted impact top 27% in AI · last 90 daysOriginality Highly original
AI Analysis

For enterprises deploying LLM-based agents, this work provides a runtime governance framework that enforces richer policy structures (obligations, dispensations, conflict resolution) not supported by existing systems.

The paper addresses the challenge of governing autonomous LLM-driven agents beyond simple permit/prohibit rules, proposing AgenticRei, a deontic policy framework that handles obligations, dispensations, conflict resolution, and ontological reasoning. It demonstrates that current policy engines cannot express these constraints, and shows that AgenticRei can capture complex governance requirements for security and privacy.

Autonomous agentic AI systems driven by Large Language Models (LLMs) introduce a new class of security, privacy, and compliance challenges: an agent that can invoke tools, manipulate data, install software, and coordinate with peer agents across organizational boundaries must be constrained not just by authentication and access control, but by the full structure of enterprise governance. This includes specifying what agents are permitted and prohibited from doing, what they areobliged to do after certain actions (e.g., notify the CISO), under what conditions a standing obligation may be waived, and which rules take precedence when policies conflict. This governance problem exceeds what current policy engines provide. Systems such as XACML, Rego, and Cedar address only the permit/prohibit subset of this governance structure. They do not provide obligation lifecycle management, meta-policy conflict resolution, dispensations that waive obligations in specific circumstances, and ontological reasoning over domain class hierarchies commonly found in applications such as healthcare, cybersecurity, or data privacy. We propose AgenticRei, which realizes key governance requirements such as obligations, dispensations, policy conflict resolutions, and reasoning over policies, as well as the basic permit/prohibit constraints. We use a deontic policy language built on the Rei framework, expressed as OWL (Web Ontology Language) and evaluated at runtime by a high-performance logic engine entirely outside the LLM. The same pipeline governs both tool invocations by the agent and agent-to-agent messages. We show through examples that deontic policies capture governance constraints around security and privacy that mostly cannot be expressed in current production engines. Our approach composes naturally with industry-standard frameworks like A2AS.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes