Hayawardh Vijayakumar

Yu-Tsung Lee, William Enck, Haining Chen et al.

Android filesystem access control provides a foundation for Android system integrity. Android utilizes a combination of mandatory (e.g., SEAndroid) and discretionary (e.g., UNIX permissions) access control, both to protect the Android platform from Android/OEM services and to protect Android/OEM services from third-party apps. However, OEMs often create vulnerabilities when they introduce market-differentiating features because they err when re-configuring this complex combination of Android policies. In this paper, we propose the PolyScope tool to triage the combination of Android filesystem access control policies to vet releases for vulnerabilities. The PolyScope approach leverages two main insights: (1) adversaries may exploit the coarse granularity of mandatory policies and the flexibility of discretionary policies to increase the permissions available to launch attacks, which we call permission expansion, and (2) system configurations may limit the ways adversaries may use their permissions to launch attacks, motivating computation of attack operations. We apply PolyScope to three Google and five OEM Android releases to compute the attack operations accurately to vet these releases for vulnerabilities, finding that permission expansion increases the permissions available to launch attacks, sometimes by more than 10X, but a significant fraction of these permissions (about 15-20%) are not convertible into attack operations. Using PolyScope, we find two previously unknown vulnerabilities, showing how PolyScope helps OEMs triage the complex combination of access control policies down to attack operations worthy of testing.

Xinyang Ge, Hayawardh Vijayakumar, Trent Jaeger

Many smartphones now deploy conventional operating systems, so the rootkit attacks so prevalent on desktop and server systems are now a threat to smartphones. While researchers have advocated using virtualization to detect and prevent attacks on operating systems (e.g., VM introspection and trusted virtual domains), virtualization is not practical on smartphone systems due to the lack of virtualization support and/or the expense of virtualization. Current smartphone processors do have hardware support for running a protected environment, such as the ARM TrustZone extensions, but such hardware does not control the operating system operations sufficiently to enable VM introspection. In particular, a conventional operating system running with TrustZone still retains full control of memory management, which a rootkit can use to prevent traps on sensitive instructions or memory accesses necessary for effective introspection. In this paper, we present SPROBES, a novel primitive that enables introspection of operating systems running on ARM TrustZone hardware. Using SPROBES, an introspection mechanism protected by TrustZone can instrument individual operating system instructions of its choice, receiving an unforgeable trap whenever any SPROBE is executed. The key challenge in designing SPROBES is preventing the rootkit from removing them, but we identify a set of five invariants whose enforcement is sufficient to restrict rootkits to execute only approved, SPROBE-injected kernel code. We implemented a proof-of-concept version of SPROBES for the ARM Fast Models emulator, demonstrating that in Linux kernel 2.6.38, only 12 SPROBES are sufficient to enforce all five of these invariants. With SPROBES we show that it is possible to leverage the limited TrustZone extensions to limit conventional kernel execution to approved code comprehensively.