Sorrel: A simple and flexible framework for multi-agent reinforcement learningRebekah A. Gelpí, Yibing Ju, Ethan C. Jackson et al.
We introduce Sorrel (https://github.com/social-ai-uoft/sorrel), a simple Python interface for generating and testing new multi-agent reinforcement learning environments. This interface places a high degree of emphasis on simplicity and accessibility, and uses a more psychologically intuitive structure for the basic agent-environment loop, making it a useful tool for social scientists to investigate how learning and social interaction leads to the development and change of group dynamics. In this short paper, we outline the basic design philosophy and features of Sorrel.
Temporal-Difference Learning Using Distributed Error SignalsJonas Guan, Shon Eduard Verch, Claas Voelcker et al.
A computational problem in biological reward-based learning is how credit assignment is performed in the nucleus accumbens (NAc). Much research suggests that NAc dopamine encodes temporal-difference (TD) errors for learning value predictions. However, dopamine is synchronously distributed in regionally homogeneous concentrations, which does not support explicit credit assignment (like used by backpropagation). It is unclear whether distributed errors alone are sufficient for synapses to make coordinated updates to learn complex, nonlinear reward-based learning tasks. We design a new deep Q-learning algorithm, Artificial Dopamine, to computationally demonstrate that synchronously distributed, per-layer TD errors may be sufficient to learn surprisingly complex RL tasks. We empirically evaluate our algorithm on MinAtar, the DeepMind Control Suite, and classic control tasks, and show it often achieves comparable performance to deep RL algorithms that use backpropagation.
2.6LGDec 9, 2024
Food for thought: How can machine learning help better predict and understand changes in food prices?Kristina L. Kupferschmidt, James Requiema, Mya Simpson et al.
In this work, we address a lack of systematic understanding of fluctuations in food affordability in Canada. Canada's Food Price Report (CPFR) is an annual publication that predicts food inflation over the next calendar year. The published predictions are a collaborative effort between forecasting teams that each employ their own approach at Canadian Universities: Dalhousie University, the University of British Columbia, the University of Saskatchewan, and the University of Guelph/Vector Institute. While the University of Guelph/Vector Institute forecasting team has leveraged machine learning (ML) in previous reports, the most recent editions (2024--2025) have also included a human-in-the-loop approach. For the 2025 report, this focus was expanded to evaluate several different data-centric approaches to improve forecast accuracy. In this study, we evaluate how different types of forecasting models perform when estimating food price fluctuations. We also examine the sensitivity of models that curate time series data representing key factors in food pricing.
Decision-Directed Data DecompositionBrent D. Davis, Ethan Jackson, Daniel J. Lizotte
We present an algorithm, Decision-Directed Data Decomposition (D4), which decomposes a dataset into two components. The first contains most of the useful information for a specified supervised learning task. The second orthogonal component contains little information about the task but retains associations and information that were not targeted. The algorithm is simple and scalable. We illustrate its application in image and text processing domains. Our results show that 1) post-hoc application of D4 to an image representation space can remove information about specified concepts without impacting other concepts, 2) D4 is able to improve predictive generalization in certain settings, and 3) applying D4 to word embedding representations produces state-of-the-art results in debiasing.
Novelty Search for Deep Reinforcement Learning Policy Network Weights by Action Sequence Edit Metric DistanceEthan C. Jackson, Mark Daley
Reinforcement learning (RL) problems often feature deceptive local optima, and learning methods that optimize purely for reward signal often fail to learn strategies for overcoming them. Deep neuroevolution and novelty search have been proposed as effective alternatives to gradient-based methods for learning RL policies directly from pixels. In this paper, we introduce and evaluate the use of novelty search over agent action sequences by string edit metric distance as a means for promoting innovation. We also introduce a method for stagnation detection and population resampling inspired by recent developments in the RL community that uses the same mechanisms as novelty search to promote and develop innovative policies. Our methods extend a state-of-the-art method for deep neuroevolution using a simple-yet-effective genetic algorithm (GA) designed to efficiently learn deep RL policy network weights. Experiments using four games from the Atari 2600 benchmark were conducted. Results provide further evidence that GAs are competitive with gradient-based algorithms for deep RL. Results also demonstrate that novelty search over action sequences is an effective source of selection pressure that can be integrated into existing evolutionary algorithms for deep RL.
2.3APFeb 3, 2018
On the Generalizability of Linear and Non-Linear Region of Interest-Based Multivariate Regression Models for fMRI DataEthan C. Jackson, James Alexander Hughes, Mark Daley
In contrast to conventional, univariate analysis, various types of multivariate analysis have been applied to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. In this paper, we compare two contemporary approaches for multivariate regression on task-based fMRI data: linear regression with ridge regularization and non-linear symbolic regression using genetic programming. The data for this project is representative of a contemporary fMRI experimental design for visual stimuli. Linear and non-linear models were generated for 10 subjects, with another 4 withheld for validation. Model quality is evaluated by comparing $R$ scores (Pearson product-moment correlation) in various contexts, including single run self-fit, within-subject generalization, and between-subject generalization. Propensity for modelling strategies to overfit is estimated using a separate resting state scan. Results suggest that neither method is objectively or inherently better than the other.