Ting Liu

CL
h-index7
3papers
26citations
Novelty48%
AI Score37

3 Papers

1.3CLSep 8, 2023Code
Manifold-based Verbalizer Space Re-embedding for Tuning-free Prompt-based Classification

Haochun Wang, Sendong Zhao, Chi Liu et al.

Prompt-based classification adapts tasks to a cloze question format utilizing the [MASK] token and the filled tokens are then mapped to labels through pre-defined verbalizers. Recent studies have explored the use of verbalizer embeddings to reduce labor in this process. However, all existing studies require a tuning process for either the pre-trained models or additional trainable embeddings. Meanwhile, the distance between high-dimensional verbalizer embeddings should not be measured by Euclidean distance due to the potential for non-linear manifolds in the representation space. In this study, we propose a tuning-free manifold-based space re-embedding method called Locally Linear Embedding with Intra-class Neighborhood Constraint (LLE-INC) for verbalizer embeddings, which preserves local properties within the same class as guidance for classification. Experimental results indicate that even without tuning any parameters, our LLE-INC is on par with automated verbalizers with parameter tuning. And with the parameter updating, our approach further enhances prompt-based tuning by up to 3.2%. Furthermore, experiments with the LLaMA-7B&13B indicate that LLE-INC is an efficient tuning-free classification approach for the hyper-scale language models.

3.7CVOct 13, 2024Code
Understanding Robustness of Parameter-Efficient Tuning for Image Classification

Jiacheng Ruan, Xian Gao, Suncheng Xiang et al.

Parameter-efficient tuning (PET) techniques calibrate the model's predictions on downstream tasks by freezing the pre-trained models and introducing a small number of learnable parameters. However, despite the numerous PET methods proposed, their robustness has not been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, we systematically explore the robustness of four classical PET techniques (e.g., VPT, Adapter, AdaptFormer, and LoRA) under both white-box attacks and information perturbations. For white-box attack scenarios, we first analyze the performance of PET techniques using FGSM and PGD attacks. Subsequently, we further explore the transferability of adversarial samples and the impact of learnable parameter quantities on the robustness of PET methods. Under information perturbation attacks, we introduce four distinct perturbation strategies, including Patch-wise Drop, Pixel-wise Drop, Patch Shuffle, and Gaussian Noise, to comprehensively assess the robustness of these PET techniques in the presence of information loss. Via these extensive studies, we enhance the understanding of the robustness of PET methods, providing valuable insights for improving their performance in computer vision applications. The code is available at https://github.com/JCruan519/PETRobustness.

1.7CLDec 13, 2020Code
C2C-GenDA: Cluster-to-Cluster Generation for Data Augmentation of Slot Filling

Yutai Hou, Sanyuan Chen, Wanxiang Che et al.

Slot filling, a fundamental module of spoken language understanding, often suffers from insufficient quantity and diversity of training data. To remedy this, we propose a novel Cluster-to-Cluster generation framework for Data Augmentation (DA), named C2C-GenDA. It enlarges the training set by reconstructing existing utterances into alternative expressions while keeping semantic. Different from previous DA works that reconstruct utterances one by one independently, C2C-GenDA jointly encodes multiple existing utterances of the same semantics and simultaneously decodes multiple unseen expressions. Jointly generating multiple new utterances allows to consider the relations between generated instances and encourages diversity. Besides, encoding multiple existing utterances endows C2C with a wider view of existing expressions, helping to reduce generation that duplicates existing data. Experiments on ATIS and Snips datasets show that instances augmented by C2C-GenDA improve slot filling by 7.99 (11.9%) and 5.76 (13.6%) F-scores respectively, when there are only hundreds of training utterances.