CVOct 13, 2024

Understanding Robustness of Parameter-Efficient Tuning for Image Classification

arXiv:2410.09845v11 citationsh-index: 19Has Code
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This work addresses the robustness gap in PET methods for computer vision, providing insights for improving their reliability in applications, though it is incremental as it builds on existing techniques.

The paper systematically investigates the robustness of four parameter-efficient tuning (PET) techniques for image classification under white-box attacks and information perturbations, finding that their performance varies with different attack scenarios and parameter quantities.

Parameter-efficient tuning (PET) techniques calibrate the model's predictions on downstream tasks by freezing the pre-trained models and introducing a small number of learnable parameters. However, despite the numerous PET methods proposed, their robustness has not been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, we systematically explore the robustness of four classical PET techniques (e.g., VPT, Adapter, AdaptFormer, and LoRA) under both white-box attacks and information perturbations. For white-box attack scenarios, we first analyze the performance of PET techniques using FGSM and PGD attacks. Subsequently, we further explore the transferability of adversarial samples and the impact of learnable parameter quantities on the robustness of PET methods. Under information perturbation attacks, we introduce four distinct perturbation strategies, including Patch-wise Drop, Pixel-wise Drop, Patch Shuffle, and Gaussian Noise, to comprehensively assess the robustness of these PET techniques in the presence of information loss. Via these extensive studies, we enhance the understanding of the robustness of PET methods, providing valuable insights for improving their performance in computer vision applications. The code is available at https://github.com/JCruan519/PETRobustness.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes