Tamara Cucumides

Tamara Cucumides, Daniel Daza, Pablo Barceló et al.

The challenge of answering graph queries over incomplete knowledge graphs is gaining significant attention in the machine learning community. Neuro-symbolic models have emerged as a promising approach, combining good performance with high interpretability. These models utilize trained architectures to execute atomic queries and integrate modules that mimic symbolic query operators. However, most neuro-symbolic query processors are constrained to tree-like graph pattern queries. These queries admit a bottom-up execution with constant values or anchors at the leaves and the target variable at the root. While expressive, tree-like queries fail to capture critical properties in knowledge graphs, such as the existence of multiple edges between entities or the presence of triangles. We introduce a framework for answering arbitrary graph pattern queries over incomplete knowledge graphs, encompassing both cyclic queries and tree-like queries with existentially quantified leaves. These classes of queries are vital for practical applications but are beyond the scope of most current neuro-symbolic models. Our approach employs an approximation scheme that facilitates acyclic traversals for cyclic patterns, thereby embedding additional symbolic bias into the query execution process. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that our framework performs competitively on three datasets, effectively handling cyclic queries through our approximation strategy. Additionally, it maintains the performance of existing neuro-symbolic models on anchored tree-like queries and extends their capabilities to queries with existentially quantified variables.

Tamara Cucumides, Floris Geerts

Tabular learning is still dominated by row-wise predictors that score each row independently, which fits i.i.d. benchmarks but fails on transactional, temporal, and relational tables where labels depend on other rows. We show that row-wise prediction rules out natural targets driven by global counts, overlaps, and relational patterns. To make "using structure" precise across architectures, we introduce grables: a modular interface that separates how a table is lifted to a graph (constructor) from how predictions are computed on that graph (node predictor), pinpointing where expressive power comes from. Experiments on synthetic tasks, transaction data, and a RelBench clinical-trials dataset confirm the predicted separations: message passing captures inter-row dependencies that row-local models miss, and hybrid approaches that explicitly extract inter-row structure and feed it to strong tabular learners yield consistent gains.

Tamara Cucumides, Floris Geerts

Tabular and relational data remain the most ubiquitous formats in real-world machine learning applications, spanning domains from finance to healthcare. Although both formats offer structured representations, they pose distinct challenges for modern deep learning methods, which typically assume flat, feature-aligned inputs. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as a promising solution by capturing structural dependencies within and between tables. However, existing GNN-based approaches often rely on rigid, schema-derived graphs -- such as those based on primary-foreign key links -- thereby underutilizing rich, predictive signals in non key attributes. In this work, we introduce auGraph, a unified framework for task-aware graph augmentation that applies to both tabular and relational data. auGraph enhances base graph structures by selectively promoting attributes into nodes, guided by scoring functions that quantify their relevance to the downstream prediction task. This augmentation preserves the original data schema while injecting task-relevant structural signal. Empirically, auGraph outperforms schema-based and heuristic graph construction methods by producing graphs that better support learning for relational and tabular prediction tasks.