Rasmus Jensen

2papers

2 Papers

16.0LGApr 20Code
Scalable Neighborhood-Based Multi-Agent Actor-Critic

Tim Goppelsroeder, Rasmus Jensen

We propose MADDPG-K, a scalable extension to Multi-Agent Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (MADDPG) that addresses the computational limitations of centralized critic approaches. Centralized critics, which condition on the observations and actions of all agents, have demonstrated significant performance gains in cooperative and competitive multi-agent settings. However, their critic networks grow linearly in input size with the number of agents, making them increasingly expensive to train at scale. MADDPG-K mitigates this by restricting each agent's critic to the $k$ closest agents under a chosen metric which in our case is Euclidean distance. This ensures a constant-size critic input regardless of the total agent count. We analyze the complexity of this approach, showing that the quadratic cost it retains arises from cheap scalar distance computations rather than the expensive neural network matrix multiplications that bottleneck standard MADDPG. We validate our method empirically across cooperative and adversarial environments from the Multi-Particle Environment suite, demonstrating competitive or superior performance compared to MADDPG, faster convergence in cooperative settings, and better runtime scaling as the number of agents grows. Our code is available at https://github.com/TimGop/MADDPG-K .

MLJan 11, 2022
Fighting Money Laundering with Statistics and Machine Learning

Rasmus Jensen, Alexandros Iosifidis

Money laundering is a profound global problem. Nonetheless, there is little scientific literature on statistical and machine learning methods for anti-money laundering. In this paper, we focus on anti-money laundering in banks and provide an introduction and review of the literature. We propose a unifying terminology with two central elements: (i) client risk profiling and (ii) suspicious behavior flagging. We find that client risk profiling is characterized by diagnostics, i.e., efforts to find and explain risk factors. On the other hand, suspicious behavior flagging is characterized by non-disclosed features and hand-crafted risk indices. Finally, we discuss directions for future research. One major challenge is the need for more public data sets. This may potentially be addressed by synthetic data generation. Other possible research directions include semi-supervised and deep learning, interpretability, and fairness of the results.