Unggi Lee

Unggi Lee, Jihoi Na, Yeil Jeong et al.

Large language models are increasingly deployed as intelligent tutors, yet research on aligning them for special education remains absent. Recent work has applied reinforcement learning to LLM tutors, but these methods target a generic learner in a single domain (mathematics) and do not address the cognitive and communicative diversity of learners with disabilities. We introduce \emph{Special-R1}, a framework that extends pedagogical RL to special education through two components: (1) a two-dimensional adaptive system prompt that couples a difficulty-based support level with a disability-specific teaching style across five disability profiles; and (2) a persona-aware Thinking Reward whose judge rubric is conditioned on the learner's disability profile. On a persona-augmented test set of 690 multi-turn dialogues, our full model raises persona-aware Fit from 6.75 (generic baseline) to 8.40 (+1.65) and SPED-rubric Helpfulness from 0.720 to 0.768, leading on the four-component Total (2.911, +0.064 over the runner-up) while remaining within 0.01 of the strongest variant on the out-of-domain OpenLearnLM benchmark (8.53). Ablations show that the Thinking Reward becomes effective only in combination with adaptive prompting, and that residual weakness on specific learning disability in mathematics motivates targeted multimodal extensions.

Yeil Jeong, Youngjin Yoo, Seobin Sohn et al.

Classroom videos contain observable teaching practices, but their pedagogical and visual signals are rarely organized in forms suitable for model evaluation. We present \textit{TeachObs}, a human-validated benchmark for multimodal teaching observation in classroom videos. \textit{TeachObs} includes 30 public lesson videos from eight countries divided into 5,158 fixed 15-second scenes. Seven researchers annotated each scene with 39 binary observation codes, covering 20 visual codes, such as gesture, board work, pointing, and visual materials, and 19 nonvisual codes, such as instruction, monitoring, questioning, feedback, and reflection. Gold segment labels are constructed using reliability- and prevalence-aware rules based on Krippendorff's alpha. In addition to segment-level labels, three expert raters produced lesson-level ratings and qualitative evaluations of instructional design, instructional delivery, learner response, learning materials, and lesson closure across the 30 lessons, with rater coverage detailed in the body. Using these two human reference layers, we evaluate five vision-capable frontier LLMs across three tracks - text-only segment coding, text + frame segment coding, and lesson-level coverage scored under an LLM-as-judge protocol - and find that no single model consistently outperforms others across all three tracks, that adding a mid-frame inflates both true and false attributions per scene, and that model evaluations over-rate procedurally clear lessons relative to expert raters. \textit{TeachObs} therefore supports both fine-grained annotation benchmarking and whole-lesson evaluation, showing where AI systems can assist classroom video analysis and where expert judgment remains necessary across varied subjects, classroom formats, and annotation difficulty levels.

Shim Jaechang, Unggi Lee

Aligning large language models (LLMs) as math tutors typically demands costly reinforcement-learning (RL) training and external LLM judges. We ask whether a frozen model's internal reasoning signals can replace both. We propose the Tutoring Effectiveness Index (TEI), a training-free, judge-free four-signal index that combines a Schoenfeld-Verify keyword ratio, a math-step density, an ends-question rate, and a deep-reasoning gate from the Deep-Thinking Ratio (DTR) probe. Selecting from $N$ candidates with TEI (the TEI@$N$ rule) raises the improvement rate on pre-incorrect scenarios from $59.0\%$ to $81.9\%$ at $N{=}8$ on a frozen DeepSeek-R1-8B base, with no training and no external judge. We also measure the alignment tax of pedagogical GRPO. Thinking length drops from $1{,}764$ to $119$ words per turn ($-93\%$), Content-Knowledge and Pedagogical-Knowledge accuracy fall by $-71\%$ and $-80\%$ relative, and the student's $Δ$ Solve Rate crosses from $+0.180$ to $-0.012$. To anchor the behavioural reading, we reproduce an 82-code educational codebook on $119{,}009$ tutor sentences with a one-shot structural classifier. Together, these results offer a cost-effective recipe for building math-tutoring LLMs without RL training or external judges.

Jeyeon Eo, Joo Young Kim, Ran Ju et al.

BuddyBench introduces a privacy-constrained multi-task benchmark for pediatric social-communication personalization. Unlike existing neurodevelopmental repositories that primarily emphasize imaging, genetics, or cross-sectional clinical phenotyping, BuddyBench links drill-level learning trajectories, standardized clinical assessments, BuddyPlan self-report, and randomized-treatment endpoints within a unified benchmark schema. BuddyBench combines two cohorts: ND-03 is an observational cohort with dense drill coverage for Tasks1-2 (n = 189), and ND-02 is a randomized controlled trial cohort for Tasks3-4 (n = 86 ITT). Together, they support knowledge tracing, next-drill recommendation, clinical prediction, and causal inference, linking behavioral personalization to clinical evaluation. We additionally introduce BuddyBench-Sim, a synthetic companion dataset for reproducible evaluation. Baselines show signal across tasks while keeping pediatric clinical records protected.

Unggi Lee, Minchul Shin, Yeil Jeong et al.

Aligning LLMs for math tutoring typically requires RL-based training with multi-GPU infrastructure. We investigate whether training-free prompt optimization-evolving only the system prompt via API calls-can serve as a practical alternative. We adapt 7 published methods and propose 5 education-specialized methods, evaluating these 12 methods under 5 conditions on 2 OOD benchmark suites. All 12 best-per-method configurations surpass the strongest RL-trained baseline (R_total = 0.633), and our ParetoGrad achieves the best Pareto balance across post-test solve rate, leak control, and helpfulness, rather than dominating any single component. Behavioral analysis with an 82-code educational codebook reveals that training-free methods rely on teaching-knowledge patterns at 2-3x the rate of RL-trained models, with a compensating ~10 percentage-point reduction in intent-level scaffolding. We also find a task-dependent reasoning mode effect consistent across training-free and RL-based paradigms. Our approach enables efficient development of pedagogically aligned LLM tutors with prompts alone and minimal compute.

Unggi Lee, Hoyoung Ahn, Yoon Choi et al.

Video generation models (VGMs) are rapidly entering classrooms, yet existing benchmarks evaluate only perceptual quality, intrinsic faithfulness, generic safety, or video as a reasoning medium, and none assesses whether the outputs are educationally valid. In this work, we present EduVideoBench, the first balanced benchmark in the education domain, grounded in the Knowledge-Skills-Attitude (KSA) framework so that pedagogical adequacy and educational safety are evaluated jointly rather than as ad-hoc quality dimensions. Across five frontier VGMs, our results show substantial room for improvement across knowledge, skills, and attitude before they are classroom-ready. We complement this with a qualitative analysis of expert comments, finding that educational validity is multi-component, where a single misaligned element such as pacing, legibility, or notation can invalidate an otherwise correct video. We hope EduVideoBench will guide the development of VGMs that are pedagogically grounded and safe for the classroom.

Unggi Lee, Yonghyun Park, Yujin Kim et al.

Knowledge tracing (KT) is a field of study that predicts the future performance of students based on prior performance datasets collected from educational applications such as intelligent tutoring systems, learning management systems, and online courses. Some previous studies on KT have concentrated only on the interpretability of the model, whereas others have focused on enhancing the performance. Models that consider both interpretability and the performance improvement have been insufficient. Moreover, models that focus on performance improvements have not shown an overwhelming performance compared with existing models. In this study, we propose MonaCoBERT, which achieves the best performance on most benchmark datasets and has significant interpretability. MonaCoBERT uses a BERT-based architecture with monotonic convolutional multihead attention, which reflects forgetting behavior of the students and increases the representation power of the model. We can also increase the performance and interpretability using a classical test-theory-based (CTT-based) embedding strategy that considers the difficulty of the question. To determine why MonaCoBERT achieved the best performance and interpret the results quantitatively, we conducted ablation studies and additional analyses using Grad-CAM, UMAP, and various visualization techniques. The analysis results demonstrate that both attention components complement one another and that CTT-based embedding represents information on both global and local difficulties. We also demonstrate that our model represents the relationship between concepts.

Unggi Lee, Jiyeong Bae, Yeonji Jung et al.

Knowledge Tracing (KT) is a critical component in online learning, but traditional approaches face limitations in interpretability and cross-domain adaptability. This paper introduces Language Model-based Code Knowledge Tracing (CodeLKT), an innovative application of Language model-based Knowledge Tracing (LKT) to programming education. CodeLKT leverages pre-trained language models to process learning data, demonstrating superior performance over existing KT and Code KT models. We explore Domain Adaptive Pre-Training (DAPT) and Task Adaptive Pre-Training (TAPT), showing enhanced performance in the coding domain and investigating cross-domain transfer between mathematics and coding. Additionally, we present an theoretically-informed integrated system combining CodeLKT with large language models to generate personalized, in-depth feedback to support students' programming learning. This work advances the field of Code Knowledge Tracing by expanding the knowledge base with language model-based approach and offering practical implications for programming education through data-informed feedback.

Unggi Lee, Jiyeong Bae, Jaehyeon Park et al.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as intelligent tutoring systems, yet research on optimizing LLMs specifically for educational contexts remains limited. Recent works have proposed reinforcement learning approaches for training LLM tutors, but these methods focus solely on optimizing visible responses while neglecting the model's internal thinking process. We introduce PedagogicalRL-Thinking, a framework that extends pedagogical alignment to reasoning LLMs in education through two novel approaches: (1) Pedagogical Reasoning Prompting, which guides internal reasoning using domain-specific educational theory rather than generic instructions; and (2) Thinking Reward, which explicitly evaluates and reinforces the pedagogical quality of the model's reasoning traces. Our experiments reveal that domain-specific, theory-grounded prompting outperforms generic prompting, and that Thinking Reward is most effective when combined with pedagogical prompting. Furthermore, models trained only on mathematics tutoring dialogues show improved performance on educational benchmarks not seen during training, while preserving the base model's factual knowledge. Our quantitative and qualitative analyses reveal that pedagogical thinking reward produces systematic reasoning trace changes, with increased pedagogical reasoning and more structured instructional decision-making in the tutor's thinking process.

Unggi Lee, Sookbun Lee, Heungsoo Choi et al.

Large Language Models are increasingly deployed as educational tools, yet existing benchmarks focus on narrow skills and lack grounding in learning sciences. We introduce OpenLearnLM Benchmark, a theory-grounded framework evaluating LLMs across three dimensions derived from educational assessment theory: Knowledge (curriculum-aligned content and pedagogical understanding), Skills (scenario-based competencies organized through a four-level center-role-scenario-subscenario hierarchy), and Attitude (alignment consistency and deception resistance). Our benchmark comprises 124K+ items spanning multiple subjects, educational roles, and difficulty levels based on Bloom's taxonomy. The Knowledge domain prioritizes authentic assessment items from established benchmarks, while the Attitude domain adapts Anthropic's Alignment Faking methodology to detect behavioral inconsistency under varying monitoring conditions. Evaluation of seven frontier models reveals distinct capability profiles: Claude-Opus-4.5 excels in practical skills despite lower content knowledge, while Grok-4.1-fast leads in knowledge but shows alignment concerns. Notably, no single model dominates all dimensions, validating the necessity of multi-axis evaluation. OpenLearnLM provides an open, comprehensive framework for advancing LLM readiness in authentic educational contexts.

Unggi Lee, Jahyun Jeong, Sunyoung Shin et al.

Science demonstrations are important for effective STEM education, yet teachers face challenges in conducting them safely and consistently across multiple occasions, where robotics can be helpful. However, current Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models require substantial computational resources and sacrifice language generation capabilities to maximize efficiency, making them unsuitable for resource-constrained educational settings that require interpretable, explanation-generating systems. We present \textit{Pedagogical VLA Framework}, a framework that applies pedagogical alignment to lightweight VLA models through four components: text healing to restore language generation capabilities, large language model (LLM) distillation to transfer pedagogical knowledge, safety training for educational environments, and pedagogical evaluation adjusted to science education contexts. We evaluate Pedagogical VLA Framework across five science demonstrations spanning physics, chemistry, biology, and earth science, using an evaluation framework developed in collaboration with science education experts. Our evaluation assesses both task performance (success rate, protocol compliance, efficiency, safety) and pedagogical quality through teacher surveys and LLM-as-Judge assessment. We additionally provide qualitative analysis of generated texts. Experimental results demonstrate that Pedagogical VLA Framework achieves comparable task performance to baseline models while producing contextually appropriate educational explanations.

YoungHoon Jeon, Suwan Kim, Haein Son et al.

Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown promising potential in automating Instructional Systems Design (ISD), a systematic approach to developing educational programs. However, evaluating these agents remains challenging due to the lack of standardized benchmarks and the risk of LLM-as-judge bias. We present ISD-Agent-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark comprising 25,795 scenarios generated via a Context Matrix framework that combines 51 contextual variables across 5 categories with 33 ISD sub-steps derived from the ADDIE model. To ensure evaluation reliability, we employ a multi-judge protocol using diverse LLMs from different providers, achieving high inter-judge reliability. We compare existing ISD agents with novel agents grounded in classical ISD theories such as ADDIE, Dick \& Carey, and Rapid Prototyping ISD. Experiments on 1,017 test scenarios demonstrate that integrating classical ISD frameworks with modern ReAct-style reasoning achieves the highest performance, outperforming both pure theory-based agents and technique-only approaches. Further analysis reveals that theoretical quality strongly correlates with benchmark performance, with theory-based agents showing significant advantages in problem-centered design and objective-assessment alignment. Our work provides a foundation for systematic LLM-based ISD research.

Unggi Lee, Minji Jeon, Yunseo Lee et al.

Despite the development of various AI systems to support learning in various domains, AI assistance for art appreciation education has not been extensively explored. Art appreciation, often perceived as an unfamiliar and challenging endeavor for most students, can be more accessible with a generative AI enabled conversation partner that provides tailored questions and encourages the audience to deeply appreciate artwork. This study explores the application of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) in art appreciation education, with a focus on developing LLaVA-Docent, a model designed to serve as a personal tutor for art appreciation. Our approach involved design and development research, focusing on iterative enhancement to design and develop the application to produce a functional MLLM-enabled chatbot along with a data design framework for art appreciation education. To that end, we established a virtual dialogue dataset that was generated by GPT-4, which was instrumental in training our MLLM, LLaVA-Docent. The performance of LLaVA-Docent was evaluated by benchmarking it against alternative settings and revealed its distinct strengths and weaknesses. Our findings highlight the efficacy of the MMLM-based personalized art appreciation chatbot and demonstrate its applicability for a novel approach in which art appreciation is taught and experienced.

Unggi Lee, Sungjun Yoon, Joon Seo Yun et al.

This paper presents novel techniques for enhancing the performance of knowledge tracing (KT) models by focusing on the crucial factor of question and concept difficulty level. Despite the acknowledged significance of difficulty, previous KT research has yet to exploit its potential for model optimization and has struggled to predict difficulty from unseen data. To address these problems, we propose a difficulty-centered contrastive learning method for KT models and a Large Language Model (LLM)-based framework for difficulty prediction. These innovative methods seek to improve the performance of KT models and provide accurate difficulty estimates for unseen data. Our ablation study demonstrates the efficacy of these techniques by demonstrating enhanced KT model performance. Nonetheless, the complex relationship between language and difficulty merits further investigation.

Unggi Lee, Joo Young Kim, Ran Ju et al.

Knowledge Tracing (KT) aims to estimate a learner's evolving mastery based on interaction histories. Recent studies have explored Large Language Models (LLMs) for KT via autoregressive nature, but such approaches typically require fine-tuning and exhibit unstable or near-random performance. Moreover, prior KT systems primarily focus on prediction and rely on multi-stage pipelines for feedback and recommendation, resulting in increased system complexity and resources. To address this gap, we propose Thinking-KT, a training-free KT framework that incorporates Test-Time Scaling (TTS), enabling even small LLMs to achieve competitive KT performance. Moreover, in this framework, a small LLM can jointly perform KT prediction, personalized feedback generation, and learning recommendation in a unified output without degrading prediction accuracy. Beyond performance, we present the systematic analysis of reasoning traces in KT. Our results demonstrate that TTS is a critical yet underexplored factor in LLM-based KT, and that small LLMs can serve as unified ITS engines.

Unggi Lee, Jaeyong Lee, Jiyeong Bae et al.

Recent advances in large reasoning models (LRMs) show strong performance in structured domains such as mathematics and programming; however, they often lack pedagogical coherence and realistic teaching behaviors. To bridge this gap, we introduce Pedagogy-R1, a framework that adapts LRMs for classroom use through three innovations: (1) a distillation-based pipeline that filters and refines model outputs for instruction-tuning, (2) the Well-balanced Educational Benchmark (WBEB), which evaluates performance across subject knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, tracing, essay scoring, and teacher decision-making, and (3) a Chain-of-Pedagogy (CoP) prompting strategy for generating and eliciting teacher-style reasoning. Our mixed-method evaluation combines quantitative metrics with qualitative analysis, providing the first systematic assessment of LRMs' pedagogical strengths and limitations.

Unggi Lee, Jiyeong Bae, Dohee Kim et al.

Knowledge Tracing (KT) is a critical task in online learning for modeling student knowledge over time. Despite the success of deep learning-based KT models, which rely on sequences of numbers as data, most existing approaches fail to leverage the rich semantic information in the text of questions and concepts. This paper proposes Language model-based Knowledge Tracing (LKT), a novel framework that integrates pre-trained language models (PLMs) with KT methods. By leveraging the power of language models to capture semantic representations, LKT effectively incorporates textual information and significantly outperforms previous KT models on large benchmark datasets. Moreover, we demonstrate that LKT can effectively address the cold-start problem in KT by leveraging the semantic knowledge captured by PLMs. Interpretability of LKT is enhanced compared to traditional KT models due to its use of text-rich data. We conducted the local interpretable model-agnostic explanation technique and analysis of attention scores to interpret the model performance further. Our work highlights the potential of integrating PLMs with KT and paves the way for future research in KT domain.