S. Momiyama

Ron Bitton, Alon Malach, Amiel Meiseles et al.

Model agnostic feature attribution algorithms (such as SHAP and LIME) are ubiquitous techniques for explaining the decisions of complex classification models, such as deep neural networks. However, since complex classification models produce superior performance when trained on low-level (or encoded) features, in many cases, the explanations generated by these algorithms are neither interpretable nor usable by humans. Methods proposed in recent studies that support the generation of human-interpretable explanations are impractical, because they require a fully invertible transformation function that maps the model's input features to the human-interpretable features. In this work, we introduce Latent SHAP, a black-box feature attribution framework that provides human-interpretable explanations, without the requirement for a fully invertible transformation function. We demonstrate Latent SHAP's effectiveness using (1) a controlled experiment where invertible transformation functions are available, which enables robust quantitative evaluation of our method, and (2) celebrity attractiveness classification (using the CelebA dataset) where invertible transformation functions are not available, which enables thorough qualitative evaluation of our method.

Ron Bitton, Nadav Maman, Inderjeet Singh et al.

Although cyberattacks on machine learning (ML) production systems can be harmful, today, security practitioners are ill equipped, lacking methodologies and tactical tools that would allow them to analyze the security risks of their ML-based systems. In this paper, we performed a comprehensive threat analysis of ML production systems. In this analysis, we follow the ontology presented by NIST for evaluating enterprise network security risk and apply it to ML-based production systems. Specifically, we (1) enumerate the assets of a typical ML production system, (2) describe the threat model (i.e., potential adversaries, their capabilities, and their main goal), (3) identify the various threats to ML systems, and (4) review a large number of attacks, demonstrated in previous studies, which can realize these threats. In addition, to quantify the risk of adversarial machine learning (AML) threat, we introduce a novel scoring system, which assign a severity score to different AML attacks. The proposed scoring system utilizes the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for ranking, with the assistance of security experts, various attributes of the attacks. Finally, we developed an extension to the MulVAL attack graph generation and analysis framework to incorporate cyberattacks on ML production systems. Using the extension, security practitioners can apply attack graph analysis methods in environments that include ML components; thus, providing security practitioners with a methodological and practical tool for evaluating the impact and quantifying the risk of a cyberattack targeting an ML production system.