Evaluating the Cybersecurity Risk of Real World, Machine Learning Production Systems
This addresses the lack of practical tools for security practitioners to assess cybersecurity risks in ML-based production systems, representing an incremental advancement by applying existing security frameworks to the ML domain.
The paper tackles the problem of cybersecurity risks in machine learning production systems by performing a comprehensive threat analysis and introducing a novel scoring system to quantify adversarial machine learning threats, resulting in an extension to the MulVAL framework that provides security practitioners with a methodological tool for evaluating and quantifying attack impacts.
Although cyberattacks on machine learning (ML) production systems can be harmful, today, security practitioners are ill equipped, lacking methodologies and tactical tools that would allow them to analyze the security risks of their ML-based systems. In this paper, we performed a comprehensive threat analysis of ML production systems. In this analysis, we follow the ontology presented by NIST for evaluating enterprise network security risk and apply it to ML-based production systems. Specifically, we (1) enumerate the assets of a typical ML production system, (2) describe the threat model (i.e., potential adversaries, their capabilities, and their main goal), (3) identify the various threats to ML systems, and (4) review a large number of attacks, demonstrated in previous studies, which can realize these threats. In addition, to quantify the risk of adversarial machine learning (AML) threat, we introduce a novel scoring system, which assign a severity score to different AML attacks. The proposed scoring system utilizes the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for ranking, with the assistance of security experts, various attributes of the attacks. Finally, we developed an extension to the MulVAL attack graph generation and analysis framework to incorporate cyberattacks on ML production systems. Using the extension, security practitioners can apply attack graph analysis methods in environments that include ML components; thus, providing security practitioners with a methodological and practical tool for evaluating the impact and quantifying the risk of a cyberattack targeting an ML production system.