Hsien-Chih Chang

Hsien-Chih Chang, Suprovat Ghoshal, Euiwoong Lee

We study the Max-Cut semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxation in the regime where a near-optimal solution admits a low-dimensional realization. While the Goemans--Williamson hyperplane rounding achieves the worst-case optimal approximation ratio $α_{GW}\approx 0.87856$, it is natural to ask whether one can beat $α_{GW}$ when the SDP solution lives in $\mathbb{R}^d$ for a small dimension $d$. We answer this in the affirmative for every fixed $d$: there is a polynomial-time rounding algorithm that, given a $d$-dimensional feasible solution to the standard Max-Cut SDP strengthened with triangle inequalities, produces a cut of expected value at least $(α_{GW}+2^{-O(d)})$ times the SDP value. Our improvement is driven by a new geometric anti-concentration lemma for signs of low-dimensional Gaussian projections.

Timothy M. Chan, Hsien-Chih Chang, Jie Gao et al.

Recent research on computing the diameter of geometric intersection graphs has made significant strides, primarily focusing on the 2D case where truly subquadratic-time algorithms were given for simple objects such as unit-disks and (axis-aligned) squares. However, in three or higher dimensions, there is no known truly subquadratic-time algorithm for any intersection graph of non-trivial objects, even basic ones such as unit balls or (axis-aligned) unit cubes. This was partially explained by the pioneering work of Bringmann et al. [SoCG '22] which gave several truly subquadratic lower bounds, notably for unit balls or unit cubes in 3D when the graph diameter $Δ$ is at least $Ω(\log n)$, hinting at a pessimistic outlook for the complexity of the diameter problem in higher dimensions. In this paper, we substantially extend the landscape of diameter computation for objects in three and higher dimensions, giving a few positive results. Our highlighted findings include: - A truly subquadratic-time algorithm for deciding if the diameter of unit cubes in 3D is at most 3 (Diameter-3 hereafter), the first algorithm of its kind for objects in 3D or higher dimensions. Our algorithm is based on a novel connection to pseudolines, which is of independent interest. - A truly subquadratic time lower bound for \Diameter-3 of unit balls in 3D under the Orthogonal Vector (OV) hypothesis, giving the first separation between unit balls and unit cubes in the small diameter regime. Previously, computing the diameter for both objects was known to be truly subquadratic hard when the diameter is $Ω(\log n)$. - A near-linear-time algorithm for Diameter-2 of unit cubes in 3D, generalizing the previous result for unit squares in 2D. - A truly subquadratic-time algorithm and lower bound for Diameter-2 and Diameter-3 of rectangular boxes (of arbitrary dimension and sizes), respectively.

Timothy M. Chan, Hsien-Chih Chang, Jie Gao et al.

Computing the diameter of the intersection graphs of objects is a basic problem in computational geometry. Previous works showed that the complexity of computing the diameter mainly depends on the object types: for unit disks and squares in 2D, the problem is solvable in truly subquadratic time, while for other objects, including unit segments and equilateral triangles in 2D or unit balls and axis-parallel unit cubes in 3D, there is no truly subquadratic time algorithm under the Orthogonal Vector (OV) hypothesis. We undertake a comprehensive study of computing the diameter of geometric intersection graphs for various types of objects. We discover many new irregularities, showing that the landscape is extremely nuanced: the source of hardness is a combination of the object type, the true diameter value, and how the objects intersect with each other. Our highlighted results for the 2D case include: 1. The diameter of non-degenerate, axis-aligned line segments can be computed in truly subquadratic time. Previous hardness result for line segments applies only to degenerate instances. On the other hand, for the degenerate case, we show that a truly subquadratic time algorithm exists when the true diameter is constant. 2. An almost-linear-time algorithm for unit-square graphs of constant diameter. Previous algorithms rely on succinct representation assuming bounded VC-dimension; for such a strategy $Ω(n^{7/4})$ time is an inherent barrier. 3. An $\tilde{O}(n^{4/3})$-time algorithm to decide if the diameter of a unit-disk graph is at most 2. This improves upon the recent algorithm with running time $\tilde{O}(n^{2-1/9})$. 4. Deciding if the diameter of intersection graphs of fat triangles or line segments is at most 2 is truly subquadratic-hard under fine-grained complexity assumptions. Previous lower bounds only hold when deciding if diameter is at most 3.

Sujoy Bhore, Hsien-Chih Chang, Jonathan Conroy et al.

Given a weighted digraph $G$, a $(t,g,μ)$-DAG cover is a collection of $g$ dominating DAGs $D_1,\dots,D_g$ such that all distances are approximately preserved: for every pair $(u,v)$ of vertices, $\min_id_{D_i}(u,v)\le t\cdot d_{G}(u,v)$, and the total number of non-$G$ edges is bounded by $|(\cup_i D_i)\setminus G|\le μ$. Assadi, Hoppenworth, and Wein [STOC 25] and Filtser [SODA 26] studied DAG covers for general digraphs. This paper initiates the study of \emph{Steiner} DAG cover, where the DAGs are allowed to contain Steiner points. We obtain Steiner DAG covers on the important classes of planar digraphs and low-treewidth digraphs. Specifically, we show that any digraph with treewidth tw admits a $(1,2,\tilde{O}(n\cdot tw))$-Steiner DAG cover. For planar digraphs we provide a $(1+\varepsilon,2,\tilde{O}_\varepsilon(n))$-Steiner DAG cover. We also demonstrate a stark difference between Steiner and non-Steiner DAG covers. As a lower bound, we show that any non-Steiner DAG cover for graphs with treewidth $1$ with stretch $t<2$ and sub-quadratic number of extra edges requires $Ω(\log n)$ DAGs.

Reilly Browne, Hsien-Chih Chang

Given an unweighted graph $G$, the *minimum $r$-dominating set problem* asks for the smallest-cardinality subset $S$ such that every vertex in $G$ is within radius $r$ of some vertex in $S$. While the $r$-dominating set problem on planar graphs admits a PTAS from Baker's shifting/layering technique when $r$ is constant, it becomes significantly harder when $r$ can depend on $n$. Under the Exponential-Time Hypothesis, Fox-Epstein et al. [SODA 2019] showed that no efficient PTAS exists for the unbounded $r$-dominating set problem on planar graphs. One may also consider the harder *vertex-weighted metric $r$-dominating set*, where edges have lengths, vertices have positive weights, and the goal is to find an $r$-dominating set of minimum total weight. This led to the development of *bicriteria* algorithms that allow radius-$(1+\varepsilon)r$ balls while achieving a $1+\varepsilon$ approximation to the optimal weight. We establish the first *single-criteria* polynomial-time $O(1)$-approximation algorithm for the vertex-weighted metric $r$-dominating set on planar graphs, where $r$ is part of the input and can be arbitrarily large. Our algorithm applies the quasi-uniformity sampling of Chan et al. [SODA 2012] by bounding the *shallow cell complexity* of the radius-$r$ ball system to be linear in $n$. Two technical innovations enable this: 1. Since discrete ball systems on planar graphs are neither pseudodisks nor amenable to standard union-complexity arguments, we construct a *support graph* for arbitrary distance ball systems as contractions of Voronoi cells, with sparseness as a byproduct. 2. We assign each depth-($\geq 3$) cell to a unique 3-tuple of ball centers, enabling Clarkson-Shor techniques to reduce counting to depth-*exactly*-3 cells, which we prove are $O(n)$ by a geometric argument on our Voronoi contraction support.