DSApr 5

DAG Covers: The Steiner Point Effect

arXiv:2604.041868.2
Predicted impact top 86% in DS · last 90 daysOriginality Highly original
AI Analysis

It addresses graph sparsification and routing efficiency for network and algorithm design, with incremental improvements over prior work on DAG covers.

This paper tackles the problem of constructing Steiner DAG covers for digraphs, allowing Steiner points to improve efficiency, and shows that for planar and low-treewidth digraphs, it achieves covers with stretch 1 or 1+ε, 2 DAGs, and near-linear extra edges, while proving that non-Steiner covers require Ω(log n) DAGs for sub-quadratic edges.

Given a weighted digraph $G$, a $(t,g,μ)$-DAG cover is a collection of $g$ dominating DAGs $D_1,\dots,D_g$ such that all distances are approximately preserved: for every pair $(u,v)$ of vertices, $\min_id_{D_i}(u,v)\le t\cdot d_{G}(u,v)$, and the total number of non-$G$ edges is bounded by $|(\cup_i D_i)\setminus G|\le μ$. Assadi, Hoppenworth, and Wein [STOC 25] and Filtser [SODA 26] studied DAG covers for general digraphs. This paper initiates the study of \emph{Steiner} DAG cover, where the DAGs are allowed to contain Steiner points. We obtain Steiner DAG covers on the important classes of planar digraphs and low-treewidth digraphs. Specifically, we show that any digraph with treewidth tw admits a $(1,2,\tilde{O}(n\cdot tw))$-Steiner DAG cover. For planar digraphs we provide a $(1+\varepsilon,2,\tilde{O}_\varepsilon(n))$-Steiner DAG cover. We also demonstrate a stark difference between Steiner and non-Steiner DAG covers. As a lower bound, we show that any non-Steiner DAG cover for graphs with treewidth $1$ with stretch $t<2$ and sub-quadratic number of extra edges requires $Ω(\log n)$ DAGs.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes