3.3AIFeb 15, 2025
ProMRVL-CAD: Proactive Dialogue System with Multi-Round Vision-Language Interactions for Computer-Aided DiagnosisXueshen Li, Xinlong Hou, Ziyi Huang et al.
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated extraordinary comprehension capabilities with remarkable breakthroughs on various vision-language tasks. However, the application of LLMs in generating reliable medical diagnostic reports remains in the early stages. Currently, medical LLMs typically feature a passive interaction model where doctors respond to patient queries with little or no involvement in analyzing medical images. In contrast, some ChatBots simply respond to predefined queries based on visual inputs, lacking interactive dialogue or consideration of medical history. As such, there is a gap between LLM-generated patient-ChatBot interactions and those occurring in actual patient-doctor consultations. To bridge this gap, we develop an LLM-based dialogue system, namely proactive multi-round vision-language interactions for computer-aided diagnosis (ProMRVL-CAD), to generate patient-friendly disease diagnostic reports. The proposed ProMRVL-CAD system allows proactive dialogue to provide patients with constant and reliable medical access via an integration of knowledge graph into a recommendation system. Specifically, we devise two generators: a Proactive Question Generator (Pro-Q Gen) to generate proactive questions that guide the diagnostic procedure and a Multi-Vision Patient-Text Diagnostic Report Generator (MVP-DR Gen) to produce high-quality diagnostic reports. Evaluating two real-world publicly available datasets, MIMIC-CXR and IU-Xray, our model has better quality in generating medical reports. We further demonstrate the performance of ProMRVL achieves robust under the scenarios with low image quality. Moreover, we have created a synthetic medical dialogue dataset that simulates proactive diagnostic interactions between patients and doctors, serving as a valuable resource for training LLM.
3.1MLJun 20, 2024
Bayesian Bandit Algorithms with Approximate Inference in Stochastic Linear BanditsZiyi Huang, Henry Lam, Haofeng Zhang
Bayesian bandit algorithms with approximate Bayesian inference have been widely used in real-world applications. Despite the superior practical performance, their theoretical justification is less investigated in the literature, especially for contextual bandit problems. To fill this gap, we propose a theoretical framework to analyze the impact of approximate inference in stochastic linear bandits and conduct frequentist regret analysis on two Bayesian bandit algorithms, Linear Thompson Sampling (LinTS) and the extension of Bayesian Upper Confidence Bound, namely Linear Bayesian Upper Confidence Bound (LinBUCB). We demonstrate that when applied in approximate inference settings, LinTS and LinBUCB can universally preserve their original rates of regret upper bound but with a sacrifice of larger constant terms. These results hold for general Bayesian inference approaches, assuming the inference error measured by two different $α$-divergences is bounded. Additionally, by introducing a new definition of well-behaved distributions, we show that LinBUCB expedites the regret rate of LinTS from $\tilde{O}(d^{3/2}\sqrt{T})$ to $\tilde{O}(d\sqrt{T})$, matching the minimax optimal rate. To our knowledge, this work provides the first regret bounds in the setting of stochastic linear bandits with bounded approximate inference errors.
11.9LGOct 23, 2021
Quantifying Epistemic Uncertainty in Deep LearningZiyi Huang, Henry Lam, Haofeng Zhang
Uncertainty quantification is at the core of the reliability and robustness of machine learning. In this paper, we provide a theoretical framework to dissect the uncertainty, especially the \textit{epistemic} component, in deep learning into \textit{procedural variability} (from the training procedure) and \textit{data variability} (from the training data), which is the first such attempt in the literature to our best knowledge. We then propose two approaches to estimate these uncertainties, one based on influence function and one on batching. We demonstrate how our approaches overcome the computational difficulties in applying classical statistical methods. Experimental evaluations on multiple problem settings corroborate our theory and illustrate how our framework and estimation can provide direct guidance on modeling and data collection efforts.
13.2MLFeb 26, 2021
Learning Prediction Intervals for Regression: Generalization and CalibrationHaoxian Chen, Ziyi Huang, Henry Lam et al.
We study the generation of prediction intervals in regression for uncertainty quantification. This task can be formalized as an empirical constrained optimization problem that minimizes the average interval width while maintaining the coverage accuracy across data. We strengthen the existing literature by studying two aspects of this empirical optimization. First is a general learning theory to characterize the optimality-feasibility tradeoff that encompasses Lipschitz continuity and VC-subgraph classes, which are exemplified in regression trees and neural networks. Second is a calibration machinery and the corresponding statistical theory to optimally select the regularization parameter that manages this tradeoff, which bypasses the overfitting issues in previous approaches in coverage attainment. We empirically demonstrate the strengths of our interval generation and calibration algorithms in terms of testing performances compared to existing benchmarks.
6.5LGJan 31, 2021
Co-Seg: An Image Segmentation Framework Against Label CorruptionZiyi Huang, Haofeng Zhang, Andrew Laine et al.
Supervised deep learning performance is heavily tied to the availability of high-quality labels for training. Neural networks can gradually overfit corrupted labels if directly trained on noisy datasets, leading to severe performance degradation at test time. In this paper, we propose a novel deep learning framework, namely Co-Seg, to collaboratively train segmentation networks on datasets which include low-quality noisy labels. Our approach first trains two networks simultaneously to sift through all samples and obtain a subset with reliable labels. Then, an efficient yet easily-implemented label correction strategy is applied to enrich the reliable subset. Finally, using the updated dataset, we retrain the segmentation network to finalize its parameters. Experiments in two noisy labels scenarios demonstrate that our proposed model can achieve results comparable to those obtained from supervised learning trained on the noise-free labels. In addition, our framework can be easily implemented in any segmentation algorithm to increase its robustness to noisy labels.