Sachin Shetty

Lawrence Obiuwevwi, Krzysztof J. Rechowicz, Jessica M. Johnson et al.

Statistical visualization is usually treated as a visual medium, but data can also be touched. Three dimensional printed tactile graphs let blind and low vision students feel distributions, trace trends, and explore relationships through direct haptic interaction. Yet classroom scale use remains limited because producing each graph in CAD software requires specialized skill and hours of manual work. We address this bottleneck as a software problem through a three layer reusable pipeline in about 1500 lines of JavaScript. The first layer derives tactile design parameters automatically from plate dimensions using tactile perception research. The second provides shared chart scaffolding and five modular builders for scatter, bar, histogram, line, and box plots. The optional third layer uses a multi-modal large language model to extract structured chart specifications from uploaded images, with mandatory teacher review before print generation. The pipeline produces print ready binary Standard Tessellation Language files in under 250 milliseconds. We present the design, performance, and limitations.

Lawrence Obiuwevwi, Krzysztof J. Rechowicz, Jessica M. Johnson et al.

Emotion recognition in natural language is a foundational challenge in affective computing, with critical implications for human-computer interaction, mental health support, and conversational AI. This paper presents a rigorous, unified zero-shot evaluation of three leading commercial large language models: Claude (claude-sonnet-4-6), ChatGPT (GPT-5.4), and Gemini (gemini-2.5-flash). The models were queried through their respective production APIs as of April 2026 on a fine-grained 13-class emotion classification task. Using a stratified 1,000-sentence sample from the boltuix/emotions dataset, which comprises 131,306 sentences across 13 categories, a single uniform prompt with no exemplars was applied identically across all models. Gemini achieves the highest accuracy (39.9%) and macro-F1 score (0.363), followed by GPT-5.4 (38.8%, macro-F1 = 0.291) and Claude (38.0%, macro-F1 = 0.159). All models excel on sarcasm and desire while consistently failing on love, confusion, and shame. McNemar tests reveal no statistically significant pairwise differences (p > 0.10), suggesting convergence at a shared zero-shot ceiling. Claude's markedly lower macro-F1 score exposes a class-imbalance prediction bias. These findings highlight the current limitations of frontier AI systems in zero-shot fine-grained emotion classification.