Sami Ul Haq

Sami Ul Haq, Sheila Castilho, Yvette Graham

Machine Translation (MT) has achieved remarkable performance, with growing interest in speech translation and multimodal approaches. However, despite these advancements, MT quality assessment remains largely text centric, typically relying on human experts who read and compare texts. Since many real-world MT applications (e.g Google Translate Voice Mode, iFLYTEK Translator) involve translation being spoken rather printed or read, a more natural way to assess translation quality would be through speech as opposed text-only evaluations. This study compares text-only and audio-based evaluations of 10 MT systems from the WMT General MT Shared Task, using crowd-sourced judgments collected via Amazon Mechanical Turk. We additionally, performed statistical significance testing and self-replication experiments to test reliability and consistency of audio-based approach. Crowd-sourced assessments based on audio yield rankings largely consistent with text only evaluations but, in some cases, identify significant differences between translation systems. We attribute this to speech richer, more natural modality and propose incorporating speech-based assessments into future MT evaluation frameworks.

Sami Ul Haq, Chinonso Cynthia Osuji, Sheila Castilho et al.

In this paper, we present our submission to the Tenth Conference on Machine Translation (WMT25) Shared Task on Automated Translation Quality Evaluation. Our systems are built upon the COMET framework and trained to predict segment-level Error Span Annotation (ESA) scores using augmented long-context data. To construct long-context training data, we concatenate in-domain, human-annotated sentences and compute a weighted average of their scores. We integrate multiple human judgment datasets (MQM, SQM, and DA) by normalising their scales and train multilingual regression models to predict quality scores from the source, hypothesis, and reference translations. Experimental results show that incorporating long-context information improves correlations with human judgments compared to models trained only on short segments.