M. Ali Babar

Sangwon Hyun, Mingyu Guo, M. Ali Babar

Large-Language Models (LLMs) have shifted the paradigm of natural language data processing. However, their black-boxed and probabilistic characteristics can lead to potential risks in the quality of outputs in diverse LLM applications. Recent studies have tested Quality Attributes (QAs), such as robustness or fairness, of LLMs by generating adversarial input texts. However, existing studies have limited their coverage of QAs and tasks in LLMs and are difficult to extend. Additionally, these studies have only used one evaluation metric, Attack Success Rate (ASR), to assess the effectiveness of their approaches. We propose a MEtamorphic Testing for Analyzing LLMs (METAL) framework to address these issues by applying Metamorphic Testing (MT) techniques. This approach facilitates the systematic testing of LLM qualities by defining Metamorphic Relations (MRs), which serve as modularized evaluation metrics. The METAL framework can automatically generate hundreds of MRs from templates that cover various QAs and tasks. In addition, we introduced novel metrics that integrate the ASR method into the semantic qualities of text to assess the effectiveness of MRs accurately. Through the experiments conducted with three prominent LLMs, we have confirmed that the METAL framework effectively evaluates essential QAs on primary LLM tasks and reveals the quality risks in LLMs. Moreover, the newly proposed metrics can guide the optimal MRs for testing each task and suggest the most effective method for generating MRs.

Sangwon Hyun, Shaukat Ali, M. Ali Babar

Assessing the trustworthiness of Large Language Models (LLMs), such as robustness, has garnered significant attention. Recently, metamorphic testing that defines Metamorphic Relations (MRs) has been widely applied to evaluate the robustness of LLM executions. However, the MR-based robustness testing still requires a scalable number of MRs, thereby necessitating the optimization of selecting MRs. Most extant LLM testing studies are limited to automatically generating test cases (i.e., MRs) to enhance failure detection. Additionally, most studies only considered a limited test space of single perturbation MRs in their evaluation of LLMs. In contrast, our paper proposes a search-based approach for optimizing the MR groups to maximize failure detection and minimize the LLM execution cost. Moreover, our approach covers the combinatorial perturbations in MRs, facilitating the expansion of test space in the robustness assessment. We have developed a search process and implemented four search algorithms: Single-GA, NSGA-II, SPEA2, and MOEA/D with novel encoding to solve the MR selection problem in the LLM robustness testing. We conducted comparative experiments on the four search algorithms along with a random search, using two major LLMs with primary Text-to-Text tasks. Our statistical and empirical investigation revealed two key findings: (1) the MOEA/D algorithm performed the best in optimizing the MR space for LLM robustness testing, and (2) we identified silver bullet MRs for the LLM robustness testing, which demonstrated dominant capabilities in confusing LLMs across different Text-to-Text tasks. In LLM robustness assessment, our research sheds light on the fundamental problem for optimized testing and provides insights into search-based solutions.

Bushra Sabir, M. Ali Babar, Raj Gaire et al.

ML-based Phishing URL (MLPU) detectors serve as the first level of defence to protect users and organisations from being victims of phishing attacks. Lately, few studies have launched successful adversarial attacks against specific MLPU detectors raising questions about their practical reliability and usage. Nevertheless, the robustness of these systems has not been extensively investigated. Therefore, the security vulnerabilities of these systems, in general, remain primarily unknown which calls for testing the robustness of these systems. In this article, we have proposed a methodology to investigate the reliability and robustness of 50 representative state-of-the-art MLPU models. Firstly, we have proposed a cost-effective Adversarial URL generator URLBUG that created an Adversarial URL dataset. Subsequently, we reproduced 50 MLPU (traditional ML and Deep learning) systems and recorded their baseline performance. Lastly, we tested the considered MLPU systems on Adversarial Dataset and analyzed their robustness and reliability using box plots and heat maps. Our results showed that the generated adversarial URLs have valid syntax and can be registered at a median annual price of \$11.99. Out of 13\% of the already registered adversarial URLs, 63.94\% were used for malicious purposes. Moreover, the considered MLPU models Matthew Correlation Coefficient (MCC) dropped from a median 0.92 to 0.02 when tested against $Adv_\mathrm{data}$, indicating that the baseline MLPU models are unreliable in their current form. Further, our findings identified several security vulnerabilities of these systems and provided future directions for researchers to design dependable and secure MLPU systems.